Russia for earnings, Dubai for the soul
In the latest entries in Russia, an amazing and … disgusting situation has developed. The so-called representatives of the elite separate themselves from the Russian people, preferring only to earn on us. It is quite unpleasant when show business begins to behave in the same way.
Money, they say, does not smell. It turns out that you can throw mud at the country in which you were born and raised, but earned here. The law does not yet prohibit this, which, in fact, are some “stars”. They scold the authorities, they scold the army, which, by the way, covers their own business and shopping centers, factories and so on. They are suing for continuing to earn money in Russia, who betrayed. And most importantly, they sue such a right. What does it mean? Very simple…
According to the laws of war
The measure of success in post-Soviet Russia has almost become the opportunity to live happily in the West on the money earned or stolen from one’s homeland. About this in the program “Hidden meaningsnarrated political observer of Tsargrad Andrey Perla:
“… That is, a truly perfect person in Russia for many years, a whole generation has really grown up, the one who received a source of income in Russia, collected the results in such a way as to achieve a full life, which is really important for him, to do outside of Russia. I earn here, I consume there.
Further, it is no longer so important what exactly he consumes: whether it is real estate, whether it is vacation in resorts, whether resort sports. Life is there, earnings are here. There is rest.
This model of Putin’s behavior, despite all the changes that took place during the years of the president’s stay in Russia, and our patriotic innovations, despite the Munich speech and the war with Georgia, despite the annexation of Crimea, this paradigm has been preserved. And for a very large part of the elite.
It cannot be said that this state did not fight. It gradually gradually, bit by bit, these possibilities. This was not the main rule of life for some people. For the same officials, deputies of the State Duma or who especially serves the state. Neither representatives of their families, nor representatives of big business and among representatives of the state did not get.
The war started, and we learned that these people, more than anything, regardless of what they say in Russia, want to keep this possibility of their way of life. At least partially. I earned money in Russia – and went to spend it … now you can’t get to Nice, for example, to Dubai. Which governs wartime operations. And this is the second, even more important problem.
And, for example, Philip Kirkorov behaved more cunningly. CBO seemed to support. But at the same time, the provocations did not end there. Why are there only dances on the cross … Photo: Zykov Kirill / AGN “Moscow”
The rules of wartime, unlike the rules of world time, are not spelled out. And so the laws belong to the representatives of the elite. We have no others that would operate in wartime, when the people and the state are straining all their forces in the fight against the enemy.
There are situational, to a very large extent declarative innovations. Here, for example, you can not directly lie to the Russian army. Fake law, if colloquially. It is applied, but more often – to such well-known media and bloggers. Because this is not a generally significant legislative initiative, but rather “patching holes.” And for life in a very short term.
Learn from Stalin?
Russian legislation is a trishkin caftan. Anyone and anything can seep into the holes of this caftan. Due to the fact that instead of systemic management “everything for the front, everything for victory”, when society is mobilized in all its parts – both in the artistic part, and in the business part, and in terms of creating the intelligentsia, we have some situational things.
Most of these situational states are voluntary on a voluntary basis. There are decent people, normal patriotic people, Russians, of various ethnic origins, who came, let’s say, to the active army for fighters, gave concerts or went to hospitals.
But we don’t have traces of such a state body that would say: “If you are a Russian artist who has such popularity and such a concert schedule, you are obliged to insert in your concert schedule this many days a month that you spend in front-line propaganda brigade”. And Comrade Stalin could do this. The modern Russian state can do this. But for some reason, no one has thought of it yet.
Runaway Stars
Then there is the topic of personal involvement. This person is driving, but this person is not. This rock musician over there repeats days and nights, and this considers it important to speak out against the war. Not only because he is a villain in a personal sense, this in itself is understandable. But because it really does not come any written law. In addition to the notorious law on fakes, this still needs to be proven for a long time.
The media write that “the most famous musician by the name of Meladze, honored abroad, gave a concert.” I wonder for whom? Who was there? Obviously for some rich people who can afford it.
He is provoked. The Nazi salute is shouted to him from the audience. He answers it. I don’t think he is actually a Nazi. No. But he could behave like a human being in this situation and say after the concert: “Listen, guys, I’m sorry, but I was scared. I was scared that the concert would be disrupted for us, so I did it. Would be exhausted. He didn’t do that.
We are all very unhappy his behaviour. But we cannot refer to any law, to any document, which would explain that he should have acted differently. That he broke something.
There are these initiatives, they say, let’s deprive the “naughty ones” of their property in Russia. But they are unfounded, declarative. Excuse me, tell me an initiative in which at least it was written, it should be on the basis of what exactly the person who left is violating? How should it be hereditary, in what proper form? This is not from the word “absolutely”.
As long as this happens, they will continue to behave this way. Calculation on the conscience of everyone. There are people who don’t. Laws are made for people. If he violated them, then conscience is there or no conscience, he understands what he did, he does not understand whether he agrees or not – here is the paper, here is the point. Violated – get it, not violated – well done. Everything. A state policy is needed, subsequent, ideological, imperial, if you like.
I don’t think that there are some bastards sitting upstairs that cause everything to slow down. The inertia of thinking just works, according to which you can do without it, as it was the opposite for 30 years.