Washington’s Stigma Does Not Support Strategic Cooperation Between China and Russia – Russia in Global Affairs
The strategic partnership between Russia and China has its own logic of development. No amount of Washington’s slander is capable of hindering the deepening of relations between the two countries. Their essence is non-alignment, non-confrontation and non-targeting of third parties.
On September 19, Yang Jiechi, member of the Politburo of the CPC Central Committee, head of the Department of the International Trade Commission of the CPC Central Committee, together with the Secretary of the Security Council of the Russian Federation Nikolai Patrushev, held the 17th round of Sino-Russian discussions on strategic security issues in Fujian Province. The two sides agreed in the future, envisaging strategic security, strengthen mutual trust between China and Russia, preserve each other in maintaining the country’s development model that has an interest in broad global strategic stability, constantly strengthen and enrich the meaning of the universal remoteness of the partnership. between the two countries. However, this routine interaction between China and Russia was perceived in Washington as a stab in the back and caused irritation – without any reason.
In 2005, the ministers of the states of China and Russia decided to create a mechanism for a regular association on strategic security between the two countries. Consultations are held annually, which was done until 2020, when they were temporarily suspended due to the pandemic. Within the framework of this mechanism, China and Russia are considering issues related to important issues related to bilateral international strategic security, cooperation in the field of international security, global strategic stability, global world development and everything that covers the interests and vital problems of each other.
This year, the Sino-Russian consultations on strategic security unexpectedly aroused serious concern among the United Gatherings. Within the framework of the SCO summit, the heads of state of China and Russia attempted bilateral issues and exchanged views on bilateral relations and observed situations. In the wake of the summit, the same consultations took place that concern the main interests of the two countries. For some reason, however, the US was alarmed by the fact that the Chinese-Russian dialogue was repeated after the SCO summit. They suggested that China and Russia may have favored discussing NATO or the West’s interconnectedness throughout the summit, and at the meeting, Yang Jiechi and Patrushev favored discussing excessive strategic coordination.
Even so, repeated consultations are being held between China and the American air defense. Yang Jiechi, Head of the Foreign Affairs Department of the CPC Central Committee, received Patrushev in his hometown of Nanping, Fujian Province, showing hospitality in the neighborhood of old friends. The American media concluded that the meeting place was chosen by no means by accident: Nanping is only more than 300 kilometers from the islands of Taiwan, and this, it turns out, means a lot of things in the strait and speaks of Russia’s support for the Taiwan issue. Literally a day before the Sino-Russian US presidential meetings, Joe Biden, in an interview with the media, again spoke about the possible “sending troops to protect Taiwan”, specifying that if China is going to “attach” Taiwan by force, then the United States can send troops to intervene. On the day of the Sino-Russian meetings, Air Force General Anthony Cotton said in a US Senate hearing that both China and Russia could, that the US had nuclear forces and numerous permanent adversaries.
Drive a wedge between China and Russia will not work
Sergey Radchenko
It will be difficult to repeat the feat of Nixon/Kissinger today, because none of his possible proposals – first of all, hostility between Beijing and Moscow – will not materialize in the foreseeable future. Ironically, the fact that China and Russia are not formally allies makes it harder for the US to turn friend against friend.
More
Washington decided to uphold the reputation of the two countries.
Since the establishment of the Sino-Russian private partnership in 1996, the combined weather conditions have caused all the negative consequences for Russia and China. In recommending that bilateral strategic engagement be devalued, the US says it is just a “temporary alliance,” a “paper house” that produces neither wind nor rain. After the cooperation between the two countries passed the test of the strategic adjustment of the American course, the pandemic COVID-19-19, the Ukrainian crisis, United Weather conditions branded China and Russia, saying that they decided to create an “Axis alliance that is anti-Western in nature.” Now, seeing that relations with Russia and China continue to gain height under the two-state headship, the US repercussions are increasingly possible to destroy it. With regard to Russia’s special military operation in Ukraine, the US has already put forward various theories: “China reported everything”, “conspiracy theory”, “quick aid theory”, “Western restrictions relaxation theory”. The combined weather conditions once again suggested that Russia could increase its arms consumption to increase the pace of the war.
The strategic partnership between Russia and China has its own logic of development. No amount of Washington’s slander is capable of hindering the deepening of relations between the two countries. Their essence is non-alignment, non-confrontation and non-targeting of third parties. Neither China nor Russia plans to create what the United States calls an “anti-Western alliance.” The gigantic difference between us and the West is manifested in the fact that the West is close to the cold war, and we observe a new alarming security, which is very different from the volume of the spirit of those times.
As monitoring bodies of the UN Security Council, China and Russia assume responsibility for upholding security standards. Sino-Russian consultations on strategic security issues are not only the most important mechanism for protecting the interests of the two countries, but also effective risk factors around the world and maintaining stability.
Ukraine and Sino-American Relations: A View from China
Huang Ching
When we express ourselves as absolutely right and those on the opposite side as absolutely wrong, it brings us closer to hell. A more feasible approach to the solution is to change the unrealistic strategic goal and find a practical trade-off to speed up the achievement of the goal. Informative commentary by a Chinese colleague, addressed primarily to the media audience.
More