imbroglio around the latest kidnapping alert
The police officers from the Lens police station would not have made the link between the handrail filed by Halim, the father of the family, on Friday, December 17 at around 10 p.m., and the report of the disappearance of Hamza, 12, the next day, which triggered the kidnapping alert device.
In any case, this would have been concluded by the investigation report of the judicial police, consulted and revealed by The Parisian. That Friday, Halim receives a text from his son, begging him to come and get him and threatening to run away from his foster family, in which the child had been placed for three days as part of the separation of his parents.
Halim then decides to act, he picks up his child in the home without any violence around 8 p.m. When he rings the doorbell, his son rushes into his car and asks him to hurry away. A few minutes later, the father decides to telephone the Lens police station before physically get there at 10 p.m. to signal “it’s clear” that he “had recovered his son who felt bad and was blackmailing suicide in his new foster family”, even explaining to the police that he was taking his son to his sister’s.
When the nursery assistant reports Hamza’s disappearance, the authorities would not have made the connection and would not have decided to trigger the kidnapping alert system the next morning at 6 a.m., according to the PJ report. It was by seeing their faces on all the television channels that Halim calls the emergency number at 9 a.m.
The father of the family this Monday in court
The 12-year-old teenager is recovered and the father questioned by the BRI at his sister’s house, in the most total incomprehension: “I acted like a father whose son is in danger. My intention was never to to remove it and even less to sequester it “, affirmed Halim to the investigators, assuring to have wanted to do things” in the rules “fr warning the police and social services, like that a summer confirmed by investigation.
If the qualification of kidnapping was rejected, a month after the facts, the father of about forty years will however appear in court this Monday, January 10 for “child abduction”, what his lawyer denounces: “This case is the demonstration of what the judicial institution says to produce of worse”, estimates Damien Legrand.
“Not only does she get carried away because she is dysfunctional, but in addition, she shows herself unable to recognize it. Rather than apologize for the harm suffered as a result of the media exposure, she prefers invent an offense and one that is based on nothing, only to continue appearances, “he then lamented.