“Armata” Russia has changed the rules of the game for the United States and Britain
https://ria.ru/20211230/armata-1766235658.html
Russia has changed the rules of the game for the United States and Britain
“Armata” Russia changed the rules of the game for the United States and Britain – Russia news today
Russia has changed the rules of the game for the United States and Britain
After the appearance of the Russian T-14 Armata tank in 2015, it became clear that there was no corresponding level in the UK and the USA, writes the columnist for The … RIA Novosti, 12/30/2021
2021-12-30T19: 58
2021-12-30T19: 58
2021-12-30T20: 36
in the world
USA
Iraq
Great Britain
NATO
t-72 “ural”
armata
t-14
/ html / head / meta[@name=”og:title”]/@content
/ html / head / meta[@name=”og:description”]/@content
https://cdnn21.img.ria.ru/images/07e5/02/15/1598470347_310:399:3242:2048_1920x0_80_0_0_086d2c6f4e6534bc30362d1ad723b234.jpg
MOSCOW, December 30 – RIA Novosti. After the Russian T-14 Armata tank in 2015, it became clear that there was no corresponding level in the UK and the US, writes Will Flannigan, a columnist for The National Interest. more than ten years, and nowhere, except for the war in Iraq, they were not used in combat conditions. Speech, in particular, about American “Abrams” (M1A2 Abrams) and British “Challengers 2” (Challenger 2). “Challenger 2” and “Abrams” M1A2 became the embodiment of the highest achievements in the development of NATO armored vehicles in the 1990s, “- says the article. At the present stage, Western tanks are becoming obsolete, especially in comparison with the” Armata “. “Given this shift in emphasis, it becomes obvious and serious miscalculation in NATO’s military planning,” the T-14 can well be argued that later, in 2010, the British government reduced the order of Challengers 2 by 40 percent. Flannigan added, Flannigan added. The assessment of the T-14’s compliance with the unified design criteria for armored vehicles testifies to the strength of the military and their understanding of the structural designs of the tank, “the author added, that the Armata is maneuverable, but at the same time meets the requirements for survivability and firepower. The Russian armored vehicle is equipped with 125 -millimeter smoothbore cannon and machine gun territories. The gun is also capable of firing anti-tank guided missiles (ATGM). ATGM “Afghanit”. Neither Challengers 2, nor Abrams M1A2, no active defense systems are usually used, although in 2017 the army The United States began testing the Trophy complex to modernize the future armored vehicle. At the same time, the electronic suppression systems developed in Germany were tested on the Challengers 2, but the decision to install them has not yet been made, expert. Another problem of Western vehicles is firepower. for example, rifled cannons, and plans for the modernization of these armored vehicles are needed do not completely solve this problem. Om increased protection and firepower of tanks can lead to a drop in maneuverability – the strength of the “Challengers” and “Abrams”, Observer Prize. in Russia, a new generation T-14 tank was created on the basis of the Armata universal platform. An excellent feature of the vehicle is a completely uninhabited tower; the tank’s crew is in a separate capsule inside the hull. On the basis of “Armata” also developed the BMP T-15 – an armored recovery vehicle.
https://ria.ru/20210916/armiya-1750340871.html
https://ria.ru/20210803/tank-1744241415.html
https://ria.ru/20210523/armata-1733541490.html
https://ria.ru/20210303/monstr-1599688679.html
USA
Iraq
Great Britain
Russia
RIA News
7 495 645-6601
FSUE MIA “Russia Today”
https: //xn--c1acbl2abdlkab1og.xn--p1ai/awards/
2021
RIA News
7 495 645-6601
FSUE MIA “Russia Today”
https: //xn--c1acbl2abdlkab1og.xn--p1ai/awards/
news
ru-RU
https://ria.ru/docs/about/copyright.html
https: //xn--c1acbl2abdlkab1og.xn--p1ai/
RIA News
7 495 645-6601
FSUE MIA “Russia Today”
https: //xn--c1acbl2abdlkab1og.xn--p1ai/awards/
RIA News
7 495 645-6601
FSUE MIA “Russia Today”
https: //xn--c1acbl2abdlkab1og.xn--p1ai/awards/
RIA News
7 495 645-6601
FSUE MIA “Russia Today”
https: //xn--c1acbl2abdlkab1og.xn--p1ai/awards/
in the world, usa, iraq, great britain, nato, t-72 “ural”, armata, t-14, russia
“Armata” Russia has changed the rules of the game for the United States and Britain
“Challenger 2” and “Abrams” M1A2 were the embodiment of the highest achievements in the development of NATO armored vehicles in the 1990s, “the article says.
September 16, 14:57
The US urged not to joke with the Russian army
“This shift in emphasis is becoming an obvious and serious miscalculation in NATO’s military planning,” the author stated.
“With the arrival in 2015, armored forces remain important,” added Flannigan.
Only after that did Britain start modernizing the Challengers, while the United States continued its program to improve the Abrams. The expert called Armata from the time of the Cold War a case of creating a fundamentally new tank with a significant design change.
August 3, 20:28
The US called a “real killer” from Russia, capable of resisting NATO
“The assessment of the T-14’s compliance with a single criterion for the design of armored vehicles testifies to the competence of the Russian military and their understanding of the structural capabilities of the tank,” the author added.
The observer approves that the Armata is maneuverable, but at the same time meets the requirements for survivability and firepower.
The Russian armored vehicle is equipped with a 125mm smoothbore cannon and machine guns. The gun is also capable of firing anti-tank guided missiles (ATGM). Survivability is ensured by active protection and the ATGM “Afganit” interception system.
May 23, 17:05
“A Serious Threat to NATO.” N.I. compared the “Armata” with the American “Abrams”
Another problem with Western vehicles is firepower. On “Challengers”, for example, rifled guns, and plans to modernize these armored vehicles are needed, do not completely solve this problem. At the same time, strengthening the protection and firepower of tanks can lead to a drop in maneuverability – the strength of the Challengers and Abrams, the observer.
“Without understanding the problems and commitment to future armored forces, Britain, the United States and NATO as a whole as combat-capable armored power mechanisms are at a disadvantage compared to the modernized Russian ground forces, in the forefront of which will be the T-14,” concluded Flannigan.
March 3, 06:41
National interest calls Russian T-90M tank “monster”