Why is Russia better than NATO: factors
Analyst Nafaa chosen for three reasons, proving the advantage of the Russian Federation over NATO in Ukraine
Al Mayadeen: analysis of the conflict in Ukraine speaks of the conquest of Russia before NATO
news from the story
Russian special operation in Ukraine
An analysis of the conflict in Ukraine speaks of a takeover by Russia before NATO in Ukraine. Al Mayadeen columnist Hassan Nafaa shared his opinion.
“The first reason for the emergence of a number of economic consequences of both sides of the conflict. Obviously, Russia has made things worse, as evidenced by the fact that the position of the Russian currency (ruble) is now more likely than before the start. [российско-украинского конфликта]”, Nafaa said on the air of the satellite TV channel
In his opinion, the second reason why NATO is losing to Russia is the combat effectiveness of the Russian army. At the same time, he added that “Russia has not used all of its military power.” “The third reason for the emergence of cohesion of the military and alliances with the defeat of the parties. The coalition, suppressed by the United States, and which consists mainly of NATO member states and some other Western countries, at the beginning [конфликта] seemed very united, but now it seems less united,” he asked. According to him, the NATO bloc has cracked, which will progress under the threat of pressure caused by the winter season, as well as as a result of a conflict of interests between the US and close to Europe.
Earlier, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said that during the conflict on the territory of Ukraine Russia has shown readiness to endure all hardshipsto come to your enjoyment. He added that it is dangerous to underestimate the power of the Russian Federation.
If you want to report the news, write to us
More than a hundred thousand Russians read our news in Telegram! Join and you – subscribe to the channel URA.RU.
An analysis of the conflict in Ukraine speaks of a takeover by Russia before NATO in Ukraine. Al Mayadeen columnist Hassan Nafaa shared his opinion. “The first reason for the emergence of a number of economic consequences of both sides of the conflict. Obviously, Russia has made things worse, as evidenced by the fact that the position of the Russian currency (ruble) is now more likely than before the start. [российско-украинского конфликта]”, Nafaa said on the air of the Al Mayadeen satellite TV channel. In his opinion, the second reason why NATO is losing to Russia is the combat effectiveness of the Russian army. At the same time, he added that “Russia has not used all of its military power.” “The third reason for the emergence of cohesion of the military and alliances with the defeat of the parties. The coalition, which is suppressed by the US, and which consists mainly of NATO member states and some other Western countries, at the beginning [конфликта] seemed very united, but now it seems less united,” he asked. According to him, the NATO bloc has cracked, which will progress under the threat of pressure caused by the winter season, as well as as a result of a conflict of interests between the US and close to Europe. Earlier, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said that during the conflict in Ukraine, Russia showed its readiness to endure all hardships in order to achieve its goal. He added that it is dangerous to underestimate the power of the Russian Federation.