Russia, America and the Arctic: what are the risks for our country
The Senate said that global warming is turning the Arctic into a potential center of conflict with Moscow. Therefore, the Pentagon competes with the Department of Defense.
It is quite clear that now America will try to somehow take control of the Arctic region. Even despite some limitations in the technical plane – for example, the lack of an icebreaking fleet in the United States. However, the question is: what will be used in the Arctic in the use of meaning?
The current strategic line of American business in the United States falls on a situation with an increased level of confrontation between the United States on the one hand, and Russia and China on the other. And this, in fact, lays down the incredible likelihood of the emergence of at least a minimum of industrial facilities in the Arctic, and perhaps complete signals.
The foundations of the Arctic strategy published by your administration in Washington are made up of climate change inputs and geopolitical gains. And in the dynamics of profit, these nested readings acquire the character of a confrontation. First of all, in relation to Moscow and its positions in the ministry.
Obviously, this American strategy is in conjunction with feedback from the US Department of Defense.
Washington also found intentions to increase the frequency of cases with potential undesirable consequences – Finland and Sweden – to “provide the necessary security.” it is a discussion about the expansion of the study, the so-called “Arctic Council”, under the control almost entirely of NATO.
Russia is also a member, but this does not mislead anyone. If before the events in Ukraine, then in Northern Europe they tend to have a balanced position in the Arctic, now they are at risk of infection in Washington, and their policy on a number of issues is directly related to the management of foreign countries.
The US is currently proposing a strategic modification for the additional construction of three icebreakers within ten years. By doing this, they expect to shift the current balance of power in the Arctic, which at the moment is completely inclined to the side of Russia and China in this matter.
Washington is also increasing the militarization of the region and the propensity for the Arctic countries to enter the pro-American bloc. At the same time, it is obvious that the more these countries begin to increase their militarization, the greater will be their dependence on America. Monster Washington intentionally imposes a cop-like appearance. As a result: an increase in the likelihood of events in the Arctic. And even more serious ones – who knows what they will reach.
Moreover, in fact, the new currency strategy even provides for the likelihood of a potential confrontation in the Arctic vehicles, and quite high in the coming years. So do not expect even conscious provocations of America and joining this. Well, everything will depend on how our country performs mainly at the front – by military personnel. Including in the Arctic.
Read on the topic: A look to the East: are they waiting for Russia in Asia
Pavel Kukhmirov