HC DYNAMO PARDUBICE – Brno’s Marek aloga should have been punished according to the DK in the match with Dynamo for filming pd or pehrvan
In the fourth match, Komet Pardubice lost 62:25 to Tom Zohorna’s dismissal for high head. Dynamo cashed in from the following, weakened and lost 4:3 after extra time. According to the chairman of the ELH disciplinary commission, however, Marko Alogia should have been punished for being filmed or played, the Brno game was additionally punished with a financial fine of up to 10% of the basic salary. The interesting thing is that in the summer of the season, Zohorna recalled one of the blame on his person.
Conclusion of the Chairman of the ELH Disciplinary Commission:
The considered behavior discussed in the framework of this disciplinary procedure should have been committed by the Player at the time of the Game 62:25, while in the Game Players for the said behavior no penalty was imposed by the referees of the Game Mr. Jan Hříbik and Mr. Daniel Pražák according to the Rules of Ice Hockey as amended.
After conducting video evidence of the situation in question, the Chairman of the ELH Disciplinary Commission found the following facts leading to a decision in the matter:
− By his actions, according to the Chairman of the ELH Disciplinary Commission, the player met the requirements for imposing a minor penalty for the filmed fall – passing according to Article 64 of the Rules,
− In the situation in question, the Player committed objectionable behavior, that he abused the contact and triggered the further, Tomáš Zohorna further here also only as an Opponent) in order to highlight the consequences of this Opponent’s actions and in this theatrical way tried to influence the judgment of the Match referees and achieve exclusion in an unsportsmanlike manner opponents,
– the theatricality of the Player’s behavior is seen by the Chairman of the ELH Disciplinary Commission in the case under review in that the Player, after the Opponent attacked him with a stick in a short moment in a mutual fight for the puck, purposefully stopped his movement on the skates and grabbed his face with the movement of his left hand to indicate that he was hit in the face by an Opponent, even though he wasn’t hit in the face at all. With this behavior, he achieved that the Opponent was punished by the Match referees in accordance with the relevant provision of the Rules, the Player, by his actions, which, moreover, in the form in which it occurred, cannot be characterized as an inevitable consequence of this particular Opponent’s action, made sure that in the Match referees gave the impression that he was illegally defended and thus influenced the judgment of the Match referees.