Russia has put the US in front of a tough choice on Ukraine
Deliveries of Western accusations in Ukraine have received a bloody status quo, writes The Washington Post.
news from the story
Russian special operation in Ukraine
Russia’s actions presented a tough choice: either choice-based bloodshed with choice, or limited Kyiv’s speed, which could lead to a quick end to the special operation. The Washington Post writes about this, citing former US Ambassador to NATO Ivo Daalder.
“Ivo Daalder said that the stalemate in the fear field raises the suspicion of addiction before a tough choice: either the likelihood that the likelihood of suspecting a bloody status quo with dire global consequences entails, or the likelihood and likelihood of defeating Moscow. Kyiv and its exports can only count on a stalemate with a much larger and better armed Russian army.
The newspaper also cites the words of a senior State Department official, on whose appointment the administration of US President Joe Biden is discussing the option of a protracted conflict that has had serious consequences for the whole world. “The administration is ready to put up with even a global recession and growing hunger,” writes The Washington Post.
Russia had earlier begun an acute aggravation of the demilitarization and denatification of Ukraine. Russian President Vladimir Putin said that her goal is the residents of Donbass from the genocide. The head of state stressed that the ultimate goal of assessing Western weapons is to delay the special operation of the Russian Federation. The Kremlin noted that the supply of weapons will not interfere with the implementation of the tasks, but with Ukraine there is more suffering.
If you want to report the news, write to us
Learn all the important news of the day about the special operation in Ukraine in two minutes. Subscribe to our digest!
Russia’s actions presented a tough choice: either choice-based bloodshed with choice, or limited Kyiv’s speed, which could lead to a quick end to the special operation. The Washington Post writes about this, citing former US Ambassador to NATO Ivo Daalder. “Ivo Daalder said that the stalemate in the fear field raises the suspicion of addiction before a tough choice: either the likelihood that the likelihood of suspecting a bloody status quo with dire global consequences entails, or the likelihood and likelihood of defeating Moscow. Kyiv and its exports can only count on a stalemate with a much larger and better armed Russian army. The newspaper also cites the words of a senior State Department official, on whose appointment the administration of US President Joe Biden is discussing the option of a protracted conflict that has had serious consequences for the whole world. “The administration is ready to put up with even a global recession and growing hunger,” writes The Washington Post. Russia had earlier begun an acute aggravation of the demilitarization and denatification of Ukraine. Russian President Vladimir Putin said that her goal is the residents of Donbass from the genocide. The head of state stressed that the ultimate goal of assessing Western weapons is to delay the special operation of the Russian Federation. The Kremlin noted that the supply of weapons will not interfere with the implementation of the tasks, but with Ukraine there is more suffering.