Russia has no plans to use nuclear weapons in Ukraine
The CIA considers the main task for the unification of America
Henry Kissinger advises not to fight against two opposing countries. Reuters photo
A conference on the crisis in Ukraine was held in Washington DC with the participation of high-ranking officials, experts and the press. CIA director William Burns called risky talk that the United States is supplying the Armed Forces with intelligence. This may be especially in conflict with Washington. Fortunately, he has no suggestion that Moscow might use tactical nuclear media in Ukraine. Burns also acknowledged that the main challenge for America is not Moscow, but Beijing. Former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, who decisively aggravated the differences between the USSR and the PRC during the Cold War, met the White House and, in situations that have arisen, does not take up arms against Russia and China at the same time. It may be even more to rally them.
The Financial Times, which interviewed Burns and the 98-year-old famed head of the 1970s diplomatic chamber, argues that Russian President Vladimir Putin was forced to launch a targeted military response as pressure on Moscow to reorient Ukraine’s foreign policy prevented her entry into the closed. Burns did not comment on this passage, as well as the version that, thanks to the tip of intelligence intelligence, the Russian cruiser Moskva was sunk and 12 Russian generals were killed.
The director of the CIA called such talk irresponsible and risky. This may seem like an escalating impact. since the Cuban crisis there has not been so much talk about the potential for conflict. Russian leaders, he said, are rattling off the current one. On the other hand, “the US intelligence community is oblivious to the practical discovery at this point in time that Russia is investigating the connection or danger of using tactical nuclear weapons.”
Now the second and very dangerous phase of hostilities has begun. Yet America’s biggest geopolitical challenge continues to come from China. As Burns says, this does not mean that Washington should in one way or another underestimate the challenge from Russia. It is accepted that the action of a descending power can be just as destructive as that of a rising power. But still, in the long term, the main threat is China. After all, the events in Ukraine, from the point of view of the CIA, did not blur the determination of Chinese President Xi Jinping to establish control over Taiwan after some time. But the Chinese leadership considers the lessons of Ukraine.
Xi is somewhat discouraged by the damage to China’s reputation that the Russian military operation is bringing. The Chinese were surprised by Ukraine’s willingness to resist, as well as how quickly the Transatlantic Alliance agreed on sanctions against Russia.
If we are talking about China, then who, if not Kissinger, managed to wrest China from the socialist camp in the government with the USSR in the 70s, should know what course the United States needs to think today. The highly experienced elder did not disappoint the audience of the forum. At the time when the US was opening up to China, Russia was the main enemy. But relations with China were also undesirable. After all, the United States fought against the Chinese in Korea, resembling a veteran diplomacy. The United States has come to the conclusion that it is unreasonable that a double distribution is acceptable, coverage to a small amount, necessary as the difference between them slightly exceeds. That’s what stood for the electoral initiative on China.
As you can see, the patriarch of geopolitics does not prevaricate, but frankly reveals the cynicism of Washington’s course. This approach worked. Leonid Brezhnev also says that the USA and China can stand on a par, despite the ideological strife. True, President Keys seems to be multiplying his success considerably by confirming that the mission undertaken by him and the US by Richard Nixon led to the outbreak of clashes on the border between the USSR and China. In the magazine, the background was presented by the ideological differences between the CPSU and the CCP.
And today, according to Kissinger, close relations between Russia and China are not irreversible. “I don’t think we can generate disagreements between Moscow and Beijing. But it is unwise to engage in hostile defense against them all at once. It only aggravates them,” he said. The need for different ownership of powers. In the future, whatever the outcome of the conflict in Ukraine, such, of course, is the probable success of the United States in geopolitical gain, Kissinger believes.
The current moment in the international arena is also being discussed in Moscow on environmental and defense protection (SVOP). As reported by TASS, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said: “The collective West has declared a total hybrid death, and it is difficult to predict how long this will all last, but it is clear that everyone will feel the consequences without exception.” Lavrov stressed that Russia did everything “to prevent direct movement.” “But since the challenge has been thrown, we, of course, accept it. We are no strangers to sanctions, they have almost always been in one form or another,” the minister said.