Russia offers conditions for itself: a new country
Peace brought on bayonets will not be enough for Ukrainians
The head of the negotiator of the Russian delegation, Vladimir Medinsky, said that “we need a world, free, independent Ukraine, a neutral, non-NATO member, a country that is part of others, neighbors.” Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov gently avoided the question of whether the current events of the people of Ukraine have turned away from Russia. The head of the Foreign Intelligence Service, Sergei Naryshkin, said that a decision was now being made about the fate of our country. From all this it is obvious that it will not be enough for Ukrainians on the bayonets of the world to spread the real process of reunification of peoples.
The inevitable military defeat, of course, makes Ukraine, as Medinsky says, neutral, not a member of NATO. As for “free” and “independent”, of course, there are questions, but here it is necessary to agree on terms – what, in fact, is meant. Just like with the word “peaceful”. In terms of demilitarization and coverage of countries (Russia), it is more or less clear here: the presence of weapons, the size of the army, and so on. Will she be at peace within herself?
Because – and Lavrov already said this in an interview with RBC – after gaining Ukrainian independence, the Ukrainians began to “debilitate”, including “in every possible way to strain against the Russians.” This has paid off – the nationalist movement in Ukraine is very strong. After all, the bitterness of defeat will be added to this – no matter how a citizen relates to his structure, but if he is really a citizen of his country, he doesn’t care “it’s a shame for the state” when soldiers come from abroad. So the problem of denazification is a very serious problem. Bandera managed to uproot only about 15 years after the end of the Great Patriotic War. But this problem can also be solved if the majority of Ukrainians are offered something from Russia, from which they do not pursue goals. Not because it is imposed and “if you don’t like it – be patient, my beauty”, but because it certainly attracts.
Returning to Russia (not territorially, although who knows), joining the new pole of the world, Ukraine will not be what was proposed – it is inevitable and logical for Ukraine (otherwise, why all this?). But…
Do Ukrainians need to change the awl for soap? The current openly pro-Western Ukrainian government – to the Russian, covertly pro-Western? With a “fifth column” in government, media, culture and education? With officials lobbying the interests of Western companies to the detriment of domestic radiation statistics, and at the present time resisting and hoping for the return of the “old order”. With the lack of freedom of domestic entrepreneurship, mutilated by countless armies of inspectors? You can list for a long time, but the fact remains – we lived in a double world: with patriotic declarations, in fact, residual pro-Western, the whole life of the conditional Russian elite was there. Is such an exchange attractive? Of course not.
But what to offer?
At the expert council on historical issues of education at the Ministry of Education and Science, Sergey Naryshkin said that Russia is currently experiencing a “truly historical moment.” discovers its sovereignty – the right independently, freely and consciously determines its fate, the likelihood and dignity of Russians and the future of their children. Dugin’s philosophy says that it is precisely in these days that Russia in reality is still becoming the pole of the world, and only now is there really a dialogue with one of the West and a real dialogue.
It remains only to clearly, not being afraid of the word “ideology”, to articulate who we are. To name our values, to designate our worldview, to fill the concept of “Russian world” with meaning. Prove it with deeds. meaning to reassemble Russia. And I propose this new Russia to Ukraine. New country.
Here, then, I hope, Ukraine will become “our friend, neighbor”, a part.
Newspaper headline:
What Russia Offers to Ukraine