• Home
  • City
    • ALBANIA
    • AMSTERDAM
    • ANDORRA
    • ANNECY
    • ANTWERP
    • ATHENS
    • AUSTRIA
    • AVIGNON
    • BARCELONA
    • BELARUS
    • BELGIUM
    • BERLIN
    • BILBAO
    • BORDEAUX
    • BRNO
    • BRUSSELS
    • BUDAPEST
    • BULGARIA
    • CAEN
    • CALAIS
    • CROATIA
    • CZECH_REPUBLIC
    • DEBRECEN
    • DENMARK
    • DIJON
    • DUBLIN
    • ESTONIA
    • FINLAND
    • FLORENCE
    • FRANKFURT
    • GENEVA
    • GENOA
    • GERMANY
    • GLASGOW
    • GREECE
    • HANNOVER
    • HELSINKI
    • HUNGARY
    • ICELAND
    • INNSBRUCK
    • IRELAND
    • ISTANBUL
    • KRAKOW
    • LIECHTENSTEIN
    • LILLE
    • LIMERICK
    • LISBOA
    • LITHUANIA
    • LONDON
    • LUXEMBOURG
    • LYON
europe-cities.com
  • Home
  • City
    • ALBANIA
    • AMSTERDAM
    • ANDORRA
    • ANNECY
    • ANTWERP
    • ATHENS
    • AUSTRIA
    • AVIGNON
    • BARCELONA
    • BELARUS
    • BELGIUM
    • BERLIN
    • BILBAO
    • BORDEAUX
    • BRNO
    • BRUSSELS
    • BUDAPEST
    • BULGARIA
    • CAEN
    • CALAIS
    • CROATIA
    • CZECH_REPUBLIC
    • DEBRECEN
    • DENMARK
    • DIJON
    • DUBLIN
    • ESTONIA
    • FINLAND
    • FLORENCE
    • FRANKFURT
    • GENEVA
    • GENOA
    • GERMANY
    • GLASGOW
    • GREECE
    • HANNOVER
    • HELSINKI
    • HUNGARY
    • ICELAND
    • INNSBRUCK
    • IRELAND
    • ISTANBUL
    • KRAKOW
    • LIECHTENSTEIN
    • LILLE
    • LIMERICK
    • LISBOA
    • LITHUANIA
    • LONDON
    • LUXEMBOURG
    • LYON

PRAGUE

Džbán: Prague should check land transfers, says Čižinský

Sugar Mizzy February 22, 2022

The case around the Džbán swimming pool started at the moment when the owner announced that the complex will probably not open this year. He justified this by saying that the swimming pool is in a state of disrepair and requires investments of up to 100 million crowns. But it soon began to be said that the owner of the house with a change in the zoning plan could be to blame., which could build apartment buildings on land around European Avenue. “Without the planned construction, it is not possible to reconstruct the area of ​​the natural swimming pool or its surroundings,” said Jiří Němec, the company’s managing director, some time ago.

The change has already been rejected by the councilors. cities. Among other things, it began to appear from the mayor Zdeněk Hřiba (Pirates) criticism that the company is blackmailing Prague and she just wants to be able to build up the area around the swimming pool.

On Tuesday, Jan Čižinský (Prague Sobě) presented how he thought the whole situation should be handled. He pointed out that on closer examination of the liquidation of the state company Prague Sewerage and Watercourses there was a transfer of a large amount of land to the property of the capital. cities. A memorandum of joint action was also reached between the Ministry of Finance and Prague. The ODS had the main say in the then government of Petr Nečas and the Prague City Hall. “The process was actually run by two people. For Alexander Udženij’s Prague and Zdeněk Zajíček for the Ministry, “ remarked Čižinský. Udženija was then a councilor for property, today she is the mayor of Prague 2 and the chairwoman of the control committee at the municipality. Zajíček was a square at the ministry, today he is the chairman of the ODS representative club.

Land for 50 million

Prague told itself that during the liquidation of the state it was only one sold the estimated price, because the ministry did not agree with the land behind the transfer just around Džbán, they were sold at auction. “It is interesting that the auction, contrary to the law, was not announced on the official notice board of Prague 6, but it was announced on the official notice boards of other city districts, such as Prague 11, “Čižinský added. The mayor of Prague 6 at the time was Marie Kousalíková from the ODS.

The auction took place in December 2012.It was known that there was only one bidder who bought it at an estimated price. “ remarked Čižinský. According to him, it was in another case when the ministry did not agree with the result of the transfer and sold the city to the dispute.

Kunsthalle Prague.

On Thursday the council is to vote on a proposal to change the zoning planwhich would be housing construction. It is assumed that the deputies will reject it, but according to Čižinský, this is not enough. “The owner knows very well that a change in the zoning plan can be requested repeatedly,” he pointed out. Prague wants the city to get the land back at the estimated price of 2012, ie 50 million.

Persuade the owner

According to him, the ODS should work for that. “We were able to show that ten processes were under control at all levels of ODS policies. The ODS politician bought it and I think the ODS should try to get the city back, “he added. In fact, he said, the Civic Democrats should persuade Vladimir Schmaltz in particular to sell the city back to Molepo.

In addition, Prague to itself wants the audit committee to examine the processes that took place years ago in connection with the liquidation of state-owned enterprises, and expects representatives to support this proposal. In essence, this means that the Audit Committee, headed by Alexander Udženija, has the task of verifying the sale at a time when Udženija was himself a councilor.

Let’s check it out

Udženija does not oppose the examination of property operations in the liquidation of state-owned enterprises. “I’m definitely open to investigating how this sale went under the liquidator,” she said. She added that the council’s control committee had already dealt with the petition submitted by local residents and requested additional documents. “I called on the petitioners and we also called on Mr Čižinský at the previous meeting of the council to bring the relevant documents, which he has not done to date. “ added that Chizinsky’s statements are speculation.

They have a new parking house in Dolní Břežany, designed by the famous architect Zdeněk Fránek

She added that the city also entered into negotiations on a possible transfer of land to the city, which the owner does not oppose. “If the capital or the city district of Prague 6 managed to negotiate a buyout with the new owners, it would be the best solution,” she said.

The auction was the only option, says the owner

Molepo has a significantly different view of the whole case than Prague itself. “Mr. Čižinský is spreading untruths absolutely deliberately and for political reasons. Already in 2005, at the request of the liquidator, the Ministry of Finance rejected the possibility of a gratuitous transfer of the former state enterprise to the City of Prague, “said company spokesman Jakub Splavec.. According to the owner, the liquidator of the state enterprise at that time had no choice but to sell the land by auction. “Any questioning of this title returns to our country elements of nationalization as under the former communist regime,” Splavec added.

The company still sees room for further negotiations and expects that some shift towards resolving the situation could take place after Thursday’s council meeting.

Jan Čižinský.

Jan Čižinský.

Author: Blesk: Czech News Center, as / Martin Sekanina

Related Posts

PRAGUE /

Prague has relinquished vld and will open a center for refugees. It’s a mistake to Hib

PRAGUE /

Prague will reopen the center for refugees, she ordered her into government

PRAGUE /

Mushroom: Prague reopens refugee center, government decision is wrong

‹ Campus Festival helps Covid orphans with six and a half million forints – with video – Debrecen news, Debrecen news | News of Debrecen and Hajdú-Bihar counties › Toulouse: the duo of comedians Melissa and Fred are a hit on YouTube

Recent Posts

  • Toulouse: a district blocked several hours after threats of armed attack
  • Meet Unruly Phoenix, the amapiano buzzqueen of the Netherlands
  • Sweden introduces ‘methane-reduced’ beef in grocery stores
  • ASM officially announces the launch of its Elite group
  • Russia to ban rice exports until the end of the year from July

Categories

  • ALBANIA
  • AMSTERDAM
  • ANDORRA
  • ANNECY
  • ANTWERP
  • ATHENS
  • AUSTRIA
  • AVIGNON
  • BARCELONA
  • BELARUS
  • BELGIUM
  • BILBAO
  • BORDEAUX
  • BRNO
  • BRUSSELS
  • BUDAPEST
  • BULGARIA
  • CAEN
  • CALAIS
  • City
  • COLOGNE
  • COPENHAGEN
  • CORK
  • CROATIA
  • CZECH_REPUBLIC
  • DEBRECEN
  • DENMARK
  • DIJON
  • ESTONIA
  • FINLAND
  • FLORENCE
  • FRANKFURT
  • GENEVA
  • GENOA
  • GREECE
  • HELSINKI
  • HUNGARY
  • ICELAND
  • INNSBRUCK
  • ISTANBUL
  • KRAKOW
  • LIECHTENSTEIN
  • LISBOA
  • LITHUANIA
  • LUXEMBOURG
  • LYON
  • MALTA
  • MARSEILLE
  • MILAN
  • MOLDOVA
  • MONACO
  • MUNICH
  • NAPLES
  • NETHERLANDS
  • NICE
  • NORWAY
  • PARIS
  • PISA
  • POLAND
  • PORTUGAL
  • PRAGUE
  • ROME
  • ROUEN
  • RUSSIA
  • SALZBURG
  • SAN_MARINO
  • SIENA
  • SLOVAKIA
  • SLOVENIA
  • STRASBOURG
  • SWEDEN
  • SWITZERLAND
  • THESSALONIKI
  • TOULOUSE
  • TURKEY
  • UK_ENGLAND
  • UKRAINE
  • VENICE
  • VERONA
  • VIENNA
  • WARSAW
  • ZURICH

Archives

  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • September 2008
  • June 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2007
  • January 2002
  • January 1970

↑