Majchrowski versus Śpiewak. The mayor of Krakow is hiding from the inhabitants
The Mayor of Krakow accuses Warsaw activism of public insult and slander after Jan Śpiewak improved his channel, which he entitled “The fire of the municipal archive and the most famous scandals from Majchrowski’s times”. In his film of new facts, the singer did not rely on the information previously provided by the Krakow media.
However, he added a few negative opinions about the president of Krakow and hence the libel lawsuit brought by Jacek Majchrowski as an activist. The first hearing is underway. The next one will take place on Tuesday and Wednesday (January 25 and 26).
Activities that build controversy
In his film, the singer recalled the figure of the former director Jan T. sentenced to two years in prison for falsifying tender documentation. I told about the adventures of a high-ranking official who was sentenced by the court for certifying untruths in documents and forbidden to test for three years of official positions in the administration. Immediately after this presentation of the director in the city network.
A city activist in the function of a former former in Krakow, which is combined with work in the office. The woman did not hear the charges, because she took advantage of the possibility of gaining access to a criminal record, starting with the facts that the prohibitions of protégés in the form of the way of the watch. The protagonist of the film’s setting of the city was also the vice-president of Krakow, Elżbieta K., who for years has been responsible for the spatial planning. The singer lists a number of her controversial decisions.
After the film was broadcast, K. was stopped. It was not supposed to arise on the initiative of the investigator that it was an investigation. The deputy prime minister was held in connection with granting access to decisions in exchange for bribes. The woman heard the prosecutor’s charges. She is facing 10 years in prison.
To only some of the stories described in the Krakow media in recent years, which in their last, and last, Śpiewak, are supplemented with their commentary. The Mayor of Krakow on Radio Krakow said that he had watched the film “with disgust” and that the singer “said nothing new”.
Public affairs dispute
However, as reported by “Dziennik Polski”, with the fragment that first outraged the president and who used the weapon that started to start with starting the corruption.
“In Krakow, the loyalty to the boss and his system is the highest. It seems that the less honest a man is, the more he is able to go further within the structures of the Krakow City Hall. flows not only from Majchrowski himself, but also from the prosecutor’s office, which, inter alia,
Although the case concerns the public zone, because due to the mode in which it takes place, it is supposed to be about openness by machine. The court could make the trial public only when President Jacek Majchrowski requested it. However, Ten did not.
The outfit against the court verdict and who is in the dispute, the residents could use the opportunity to read the report from the courtroom. Probably, for the first time, the court battle gives the mayor of the city the opportunity to address each of the cases mentioned in the film. Until now, Jacek Majchrowski, if he had already spoken about them, was frugal in words.
Perhaps a disturbance to regenerate by the president himself, but also to belong to the group that we decide to be witnesses. Public opinion unknown their content. Without it, it will not leave but form its own opinion, it is a drop on the quality of the debate in Krakow.
The process behind closed doors
Jacek Majchrowski is a public figure, the process is a show with his activity as the activity of the city of Krakow. Therefore, if you decide that you want to purchase such an opportunity, public procurement for its launch. In the next version, the question now is where in Krakow is the introduction, which now has a preliminary version of views, and whether there is now going to a place where you have a different opinion from the prime minister and his predecessors.
When the high-ranking officials of the Krakow magistrate compared access to one citizen of citizens to a Nazi, Jacek Majchrowski argued that the constitution communicated to citizens with citizens. When the presidential councilor wrote to the donka that “she suffers from Hitler’s syndrome”, there is “damage”, her name is twisted on “Nazism at the then Krakow’s non-residential residence” of his indignation. When the high government of the president’s officials attacked, they broke the official public authorities, calling them “quasi-activists”, the president did not see in this problem. When activist Jan Śpiewak criticized the president of Krakow, ten inheritances against him were a private indictment.
Public debate is the engine of change. It allows for the development of contracts, facilitating the creation of potential, including the community, and strengthens neighborly ties. Inhabitants should have an influence on the surrounding generation, even if their opinion is different from that of the stewards.
Would you like to submit with the author? Write: [email protected]
We are glad that you are with us. on the Onet newsletter, saving the most valuable content from us.