Russian senator critical of Moldova: I did not sign a contract with Moldova – it’s bad. I signed it in decent conditions for Chisinau – it’s just as bad – News by sources
Russian Senator Alexei Pushkov expressed dissatisfaction with the fact that the Moldovan authorities, after signing a contract with Gazprom, receive Russian gas, but at the same time continue to complain about the Russian Federation.
According to Infotag, he wrote about this on his Telegram channel, being indignant at the fact that “no matter how Russia acts,” the partners “are dissatisfied anyway”, Știri.md reports.
“I did not sign a contract with Moldova – it’s bad. I signed it in decent conditions for Chisinau – it’s just as bad. Even worse.
For this, the Prime Minister of Moldova accused us of a “cruel game”, and President Sandu decided to thank the United States from the bottom of his heart for “help” where not even a cubic meter of gas came from “, said the senator Russian.
According to him, now the leadership of the Polish concern PGNiG warns: the case of Moldova is, they say, a warning about Europe’s dependence on Gazprom! “.
“At the same time, we have not prevented Chisinau from buying gas from Poland, Ukraine or even Qatar or Indonesia. But for some reason Chisinau itself has chosen not free markets but Russian gas. Because of the reasonable price. And of the supply guarantee.
And the Polish side, as always angry, and even asking Gazprom to lower the price of gas – the gas crisis in Europe, is their spin, very expensive, “Pushkov was indignant, mentioning” Expensive? No, don’t buy. “
Based on the reaction of the Moldovan leadership, he opined that: “If we had not signed a contract with Chisinau, then there would have been no” cruel game “on the part of Russia, as well as no” confirmation of dependence “.
“And there would be no Russian gas in Moldova either. Moldova would buy gas at exorbitant prices on free markets and ask the EU to pay the price difference, to which the EU would answer ‘No’. And Sandu would thank the United States for a reason “unknown”, the senator wrote, recommending “in the future to take into account what happened”.