The representatives of the government and the railway company consider the design of the new Vtos bridge
The presentation will be made by the Minister of Transport and CultureMartin Kupka (ODS) AND Martin Baxa (ODS)general editor Early railways (S) Ji Svoboda and a distinguished guest.
The content of the program also includes the presentation of other designs that advanced to the second round of the architectural competition. The aim of the event is to inform the public in detail about the course of the current dialogue and at the same time give space for open discussion.
The historic black railway bridge under Vyehradem will get a new look after twenty years of negotiations. Only the original stone sawmill should remain of the original structure.
A new bridge due to the growing demand for urban and suburban transport with three tracks and a new stop at Na Vtoni, which will replace the two-destroyed ndra Vyehrad.
The relevant architectural design was submitted by the 2T engineering studio, which defeated eleven competing concepts. Some of them would be lost with the preservation of existing structures or, on the contrary, with the creation of a completely new railway bridge, and the existing construction would serve as a lion for p, said Pavel Paidar, editor of the department of construction planning at Sprv eležnic. However, both of these options ran into serious problems.
Criticism from the old pages
However, neither the memorial nor the experts from the memorial gate are pleased with the death of S for the necessary restoration of the transport links.
According to members of the Club for Old Prague, the proposal for a new railway bridge under Vyehrad is not suitable for the importance and historical context of the city. I think the original structure of the bridge should be preserved.
In response to the new proposal, the Save the Iron Bridge initiative was created four years ago, which raises concerns about the collapse of the bridge. In addition, the shape of the bridge strongly affects the panorama of Prague as we know it, activists said on Facebook. The theoretician and propagator of architecture assessed the design as a bad joke on the social walls Adam Gebrian.