• Home
  • City
    • ALBANIA
    • AMSTERDAM
    • ANDORRA
    • ANNECY
    • ANTWERP
    • ATHENS
    • AUSTRIA
    • AVIGNON
    • BARCELONA
    • BELARUS
    • BELGIUM
    • BERLIN
    • BILBAO
    • BORDEAUX
    • BRNO
    • BRUSSELS
    • BUDAPEST
    • BULGARIA
    • CAEN
    • CALAIS
    • CROATIA
    • CZECH_REPUBLIC
    • DEBRECEN
    • DENMARK
    • DIJON
    • DUBLIN
    • ESTONIA
    • FINLAND
    • FLORENCE
    • FRANKFURT
    • GENEVA
    • GENOA
    • GERMANY
    • GLASGOW
    • GREECE
    • HANNOVER
    • HELSINKI
    • HUNGARY
    • ICELAND
    • INNSBRUCK
    • IRELAND
    • ISTANBUL
    • KRAKOW
    • LIECHTENSTEIN
    • LILLE
    • LIMERICK
    • LISBOA
    • LITHUANIA
    • LONDON
    • LUXEMBOURG
    • LYON
europe-cities.com
  • Home
  • City
    • ALBANIA
    • AMSTERDAM
    • ANDORRA
    • ANNECY
    • ANTWERP
    • ATHENS
    • AUSTRIA
    • AVIGNON
    • BARCELONA
    • BELARUS
    • BELGIUM
    • BERLIN
    • BILBAO
    • BORDEAUX
    • BRNO
    • BRUSSELS
    • BUDAPEST
    • BULGARIA
    • CAEN
    • CALAIS
    • CROATIA
    • CZECH_REPUBLIC
    • DEBRECEN
    • DENMARK
    • DIJON
    • DUBLIN
    • ESTONIA
    • FINLAND
    • FLORENCE
    • FRANKFURT
    • GENEVA
    • GENOA
    • GERMANY
    • GLASGOW
    • GREECE
    • HANNOVER
    • HELSINKI
    • HUNGARY
    • ICELAND
    • INNSBRUCK
    • IRELAND
    • ISTANBUL
    • KRAKOW
    • LIECHTENSTEIN
    • LILLE
    • LIMERICK
    • LISBOA
    • LITHUANIA
    • LONDON
    • LUXEMBOURG
    • LYON

NORWAY

We have to think big in Norwegian power production

Sugar Mizzy November 27, 2022

In the intense discussion about the high electricity prices, there is broad political agreement on one thing: Norway must get access to more electricity. This is in accordance with NVE’s forecast, which assumes increased power consumption from 138 TWh (terawatt hours) to 174 TWh in 2040, i.e. an increase of 36 TWh. The report indicates an increased production of 28 TWh for the same period. Power surplus of 20 TWh is thus reduced to 12 TWh. The increase will consist of hydropower (11 TWh), onshore wind power (4 TWh), offshore wind power (7 TWh) and solar power (6 TWh). The costs will be large, both environmentally, financially and politically. If we follow this plan, weakens Norway’s power supply. There is also doubt as to whether these plans will actually lead to reaching the climate targets. Discarding nuclear power without serious consideration is therefore irresponsible.

Safety

Safety for nuclear power is on a par with solar and wind power which “safest in class” with respectively 0.02, 0.03 and 0.04 deaths per TWh. Hydropower is approx. 40 times higher. When nuclear power displaces the use of fossil energy sources, human lives will be saved due to reduced air pollution.

Cost

– In our view, public information will show people that today’s energy policy is based on prejudice due to a lack of knowledge, write Svein Nøvik (tv) and Jan Emblemsvåg. Photo: Private

NVE have estimated costs for various power productions, but the costs for nuclear power are calculated for a 40-year economic lifetime, even if nuclear power plants last for 60-80 years. This means that the cost will be significantly lower than calculated. Standardized solutions provide additional cost reductions. The costs can therefore come down to 30 øre/kWh, where US nuclear power plants are located today. In contrast to renewable energy, nuclear power is dependent, while for renewable energy you have to add the costs of balance power (power production that must be available when there are no stalls and/or the sun is shining).

Competence

Norway does not need to develop new technology to use nuclear power. We should make use of ready-made concepts. Norwegian universities, colleges and research institutions have valuable expertise in nuclear physics, chemistry and materials technology. The industry has solid expertise in materials technology, chemistry, workshop industry, project management and more. In addition, we have one of the world’s most advanced professional environments in the field control room technology and simulation of nuclear power plants, Department of Energy Engineering. For construction, we can import the necessary expertise in the same way as when the oil and gas industry was in its infancy.

Deter more alternatives to relevant suppliers. South Korean KHNP with its APR1400 uses well-known technology with advanced safety systems (Gen III+). The United Arab Emirates has two in operation, and the next two will be delivered in 2023 and 2030, annual total production will be approx. 45 TWh. The total price for these fire reactors is about. NOK 250 billion. Egypt, Bangladesh and Turkey also have nuclear power plants under construction. Norway is no worse equipped than these nations to use nuclear power.

It carries out a lot of research and development in nuclear power technology that can provide new reactor types. These utilize the fuel raw material until 100 times more efficient than today’s reactors. If Norway takes part in this development, we will be able to create a large industry that can take over from the oil and gas industry.

Waste

Norway is now faced with clean-up work after 70 years of reactor operation in Norway, a task to be carried out by Norwegian Nuclear Decommissioning (NND). This work includes both intermediate storage and finally landfill of radioactive material. National and international rules requires that waste from IFE’s operations, 17 tonnes, must be stored and deposited in Norway. Sweden and Finland have developed technology for safe storage of used fuel deep down in stable bedrock. These are solutions that Norway can also make use of.

Norway must create such a landfill for already used fuel from the decommissioned reactors. Therefore, there will not be a large additional cost or challenge if this is to be dimensioned to also accept used fuel from commercial nuclear power plants.

The fuel in a nuclear power reactor is taken out after it has been in the reactor for four to five years. The used fuel must then be stored and controlled in a pool for approx. 30 years before it must be transferred to a landfill. There will therefore be plenty of time to decide how this will be handled in Norway.

Time perspective

Nuclear power will not be able to solve the current energy crisis because failed energy policy will take many years to clean up, regardless of technology. Part of Norway’s population is already positive about nuclear power. In our view, public information will show people that today’s energy policy is based on prejudice due to a lack of knowledge. The political parties should be able to take a clear position on the use of nuclear power before the general election in 2025.

If there is political will, the Storting and the government must quickly make a decision on the further process for location, approval and construction. If known reactor technology is used, such as the Korean reactors, the construction time can come down for seven years.

Many new types of reactors are under development (Gen IV – reactors). Many developers are aiming for prototypes to be ready by 2030. Some of these new reactor types have great potential in Norway, among other things by being able to utilize thorium as fuel.

Norway has one of the world’s largest deposits of thorium, and we have even more uranium in the sea. With these deposits can produce energy that corresponds to at least 10 – 100 times all the energy from oil and gas in the North Sea. It will require large investments, but it will ensure that Norway remains an energy superpower. That’s how we built the oil and gas industry, and that’s how we must build Norway’s next industrial foundation.

This is an investment we are obliged to make for today’s children and young people, so that Norway’s prosperity will continue after the large revenues from oil and gas production in the North Sea end.

Comments:

We have changed the system for article comments. To create a user account, you register with BankID.

Related Posts

NORWAY /

This is how the Gossip Girl star ends up in Norway:

NORWAY /

Sagosen shot to pieces Hungary – Norway on to fight for 5th place – Dagsavisen

NORWAY /

Convicted of smuggling hashish and cocaine to Norway – Latest news – NRK

‹ After gasoline, there is a discount on diesel! How much is a liter of diesel in Istanbul, Ankara? › “Energy Company of Ukraine” is planning a test import of electricity from Romania

Recent Posts

  • the Japanese garden closed to the public due to works
  • the great new wealth of the regions of the Russian Federation
  • Tvrdík enjoys the profit from the sale of Soro, Olayinka disappointed him by taking a photo with the CZ Belgrade jersey
  • Toulouse. A fiction denounces the lack of means of justice
  • swimming lessons for 3-6 year olds to prevent drowning

Categories

  • ALBANIA
  • AMSTERDAM
  • ANDORRA
  • ANNECY
  • ANTWERP
  • ATHENS
  • AUSTRIA
  • AVIGNON
  • BARCELONA
  • BELARUS
  • BELGIUM
  • BILBAO
  • BORDEAUX
  • BRNO
  • BRUSSELS
  • BUDAPEST
  • BULGARIA
  • CAEN
  • CALAIS
  • City
  • COLOGNE
  • COPENHAGEN
  • CORK
  • CROATIA
  • CZECH_REPUBLIC
  • DEBRECEN
  • DENMARK
  • DIJON
  • ESTONIA
  • FINLAND
  • FLORENCE
  • FRANKFURT
  • GENEVA
  • GENOA
  • GREECE
  • HELSINKI
  • HUNGARY
  • ICELAND
  • INNSBRUCK
  • ISTANBUL
  • KRAKOW
  • LIECHTENSTEIN
  • LISBOA
  • LITHUANIA
  • LUXEMBOURG
  • LYON
  • MALTA
  • MARSEILLE
  • MILAN
  • MOLDOVA
  • MONACO
  • MUNICH
  • NAPLES
  • NETHERLANDS
  • NICE
  • NORWAY
  • PARIS
  • PISA
  • POLAND
  • PORTUGAL
  • PRAGUE
  • ROME
  • ROUEN
  • RUSSIA
  • SALZBURG
  • SAN_MARINO
  • SIENA
  • SLOVAKIA
  • SLOVENIA
  • STRASBOURG
  • SWEDEN
  • SWITZERLAND
  • THESSALONIKI
  • TOULOUSE
  • TURKEY
  • UK_ENGLAND
  • UKRAINE
  • VENICE
  • VERONA
  • VIENNA
  • WARSAW
  • ZURICH

Archives

  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • November 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • September 2008
  • June 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2007
  • January 2002
  • January 1970

↑