CLIMATE: Demonstration of climate tyrants in Prague
Even during the demonstration in Prague on October 21, it was about imposing something undemocratically on the state, over the heads of the citizens. Will marketing dictate to us?
I was somewhat unexpectedly impressed today after the midday news that “young people” demonstrated in Prague at 12.00 for the climate. Unfortunately for me, I found out about the event from a completely propagandistic article in lidovky.czwhich carried the headline: “Empty promises won’t save people, say young people and demonstrated again for the climate.” The article appeared in exactly the same form on idnes.czeven with the same photos.
The news made me incredibly angry, depressed and I don’t know what else. Yet again, the same false rhetoric was not elected by the aggrieved, in fact commanding far-left tyrants who pretend to speak for everyone but were never elected by anyone. They pretend to be angry and sad, while showing signs in English that marketing invented for them: “You dirty lies”. “Eastern Europe”. “Together”. That looks “authentic”. They only care about their own idle careers, about media attention, about being able to order without hindrance according to the notes that remain from marketing organizations. At a time when all the citizens of this country are afraid of the future, of the price increases caused by the self-centered selfish and ill-conceived policies dictated by these climate demagogues, they act as if nothing is happening and dictate again in exactly the same way as before covid, as before the war in Ukraine.
What did they really want?
Even this demonstration in Prague on 10/21 is an attempt to impose something undemocratically, over the heads of the citizens, on the state. The organizers want to order the government of the Czech Republic what policy to promote at the meeting of the environment ministers of the EU countries, which will be held on Monday 24 October in Luxembourg. Proceedings of our ministry Anna Hubáčková (KDU-ČSL), as we are a presiding country. Then there will be the COP 27 climate conference, which takes place from November 6 to 18 in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, and at it our republic will again present the position of the entire EU. For this purpose, the organizers of the demonstration handed over a letter of orders to Pavlo Zámyslická from the directors of the Department of Energy and Climate Protection of the MoE.
They base their legitimacy on a petition, which is said to have been signed by 55,000 citizens on the Internet. Which would not even be enough for these 3-4 movements to get into parliament, let alone lead the government. You can see from the photos that only five and a half people came to the demonstration, and is that supposed to support their claim to speak on behalf of everyone? They even called it the “Eastern European Climate Demonstration.” So they speak for all of Eastern Europe? How did they figure it out? How did you find out the opinions of all the people of Eastern Europe?
How non-profits shape “European public opinion”
Look now at the democracy and transparency of this event and its organizers! They showed us the same technique of creating public opinion that they practice in Brussels. I saw it there myself. In the rue de Luxembourg – that is an alley in such a handsome park that connects the historic center with the Euroinstitute quarter – a small group will meet with banners and drums, to which they will also invite journalists. They walk a few tens of meters in front of the journalists, then pose for them with a window, have their picture taken and send an order to the politicians through the media about what I have to do.
As part of the climate campaign, they are doing the same thing on a large scale – according to mass production – in all European countries. me with us. The organizers are not even politicians, they are marketers, they are not doing politics, but a marketing campaign. And the marketing campaign is done for the client. Who is the sponsor of the climate campaign?
What kind of people are these? Say their names!
It’s a terribly non-transparent environment, it stinks. Let’s start with which organizations called the “youth demonstrations”. They say the movement Friday for the futuresays the article, as the organizer speaks but Green peace. So are they both the same? Or does it overlap? The FF are the former Mladí zelení association, the party’s youth organization that didn’t even get into parliament. Greenpeace is an international political non-profit making marketing campaigns. In time, their actions follow the climate lawsuit, which is being pushed forward by an association with anonymous members, who are represented by an alleged law firm Frank Bold Solicitors, which you won’t find out about anywhere either. For example, who is or was Frank Bold? Who pays? Who and why created such a large organization? According to the website, the Czech branch has 40 lawyers. They don’t do it for free. Their agenda is of course politically limited, it is a non-transparent political organization that aims to impose a climate policy on their citizens against their will by the method of “strategic lawsuits” against the states of Eastern Europe. How can lawyers from the Czech faculty work in their ranks and not lose their license?
But the demonstrations, i.e. the actual hard work, should have been carried out “high school students“. So apparently a grammar school from Prague, located in the capital city of Prague, where the founder is the pirate Zdeněk Hřib. They had to be given time off for the demonstration on Friday from 12.00, i.e. they were sent in an organized manner by their schools. Are these grammar schools really providing correct education for female citizens without political pressure and without ideological distortion? How can employees of Greenpeace and the Pirate Party operate here without violating the Constitution and the Education Act (No. 561/2004 Coll., §32)?
Speaking for the protesters were four people who can be easily identified through the LinkedIn social network as professionally engaged in marketing (and not “teenagers”!). They are not selfless “activists”, spiritual beings living out of thin air, but fully paid employees of pressure marketing organizations. They called Mr Lukáš Hrábek, Greenpeace press officer, who previously worked at Mafra himself for several years. Didn’t you write the article yourself? He has been working full-time for Greenpeace since 2015. Then she spoke here Miriam Macurová – works full-time for Greenpeace as a “Campaigner for European climate policies.” Prior to that, she worked in 2020 at the Institute of Active Citizenship zs and before that she studied “Social and Cultural Ecology” at FFUK in 2019-21 and before that in 2015-19 in Brno he earned a bachelor’s degree in “International Relations and Environmental Studies”, a strange combination of fields. A total of 9 years of study. Here the question arises whether she perceives her fellow citizens as guinea pigs from the field of “social ecology”, whether she takes into account that we live in a legal state with some kind of establishment… She finally spoke up here Agáta Hrdličková, according to linkedIn, the profession is “specialist in LGBT+ and inclusive education”. Here, I would be interested professionally in what they teach as inclusive? Because by being able to teach something inclusively, because it is not a given that you know it. She studied gender studies at the Faculty of Humanistic Snobbery, also for 9 years (2013-22). It is not possible to find out from the profile whether he works anywhere at all. She spoke on behalf of a certain “Headspace” at the demonstration. There is no information about it anywhere.
yet this obscure figure was cited by the newspapers in the first place. In some mysterious way, she connected the climate with the fate of lesbians and homosexuals, and read to people that because of their indifference to the climate, lesbians and homosexuals are said to live in a state of anxiety. She could have an understanding of what she prepares for people in misery with her demagoguery. Without a prospect of improvement, because a “system change” is to occur, so that the changes cannot be reversed, stopped, or corrected. I am already experiencing states of anxiety when I see with what unstoppable demagoguery these people pursue their goal.
It’s a pity that they managed their short demonstration before it started to rain. (Both articles are from 1:30 p.m., so they were finished by then.) In the middle of the rain, talk of eternal drought would be great to listen to! The biggest drought in the last 500 years!