We receive and publish

Active Health has always been at the forefront during the Covid emergency, not only to defend the rights of citizens and workers that few have defended, but also to ask for truth and transparency on the communication of analytical data relating to protocols, infections, hospitalizations and deaths, a real basis for discussion for the validity of legislative and health policy choices that have led to closures, psychological and economic damage in the country.

The period experienced saw the denial of fundamental rights, the obligation of isolation and distancing, the need to justify any movement, the denial of the right to work, access to the premises, imposed generalized information based on the fear of contagion from Covid-19, pushing people against each other, fueling a climate of fear and mistrust in the country for a disease that has a lethality of less than 0.01 percent (ISS data).

As the only exceptional solution, an experimental vaccine was proposed, neither approved by AIFA nor by EMA, of which nothing was known, nor the package leaflet, unnecessarily requested to the authorities countless times together with the data relating to its efficacy and safety.

A situation where uncertainty reigned mainly in communication by the authorities and where Salute Attiva has, stimulated by its 350 associates and with the support of various San Marino professionals, implemented all possible initiatives, including legal ones, in order to be recognized the right to understand the real health situation, also in relation to patient vaccinations, in order to “in the field” the real validity of operational choices.

Every public or private request was in vain, contrary to what happens in advanced states that equip themselves with specific public bodies or structures dedicated to the analysis and reporting of data. Nothing not about the adverse effects of the vaccine, just country rumors or direct knowledge.

As a demonstration, it seems, not even the Directors with more precise information that allow them to decide on the well-known anti-covid decrees, it appears that exhaustive information, the subject of our countless requests, is communicated only in February of this year to following a parliamentary questioning by three opposition Councilors.

The recent press reports on the Italian national team that have brought to the fore the validity of early home care in order to avoid hospitalization (ref. Mario Negri Institute), treatments that Salute Attiva has proposed and from the very beginning also with the San Marino health authorities , they teach us that science is not static, it is not dogmatic but it is in progress, it is enriched day by day based on data and evidence, thanks to the contribution of multiple contributions, in an atmosphere of collaboration, sharing and freedom of Es .

However, at the height of a period of strong social tension, with the introduction of a “Green Pass” which proved to be ineffective given the indiscriminate increase in infections right at the moment of its adoption, in December last year, our association a half of the president at the time, presents a documented document presented in court to verify the veracity of some communications made in the press by the health authorities, in our opinion, contradictory and uncertain.

We understand that the court, at first deems it useful to investigate the issues ofexposed initiating a cross-examination and then filing it, embracing the defense thesis in its entirety, without, from our point of view, a technical study and without allowing the plaintiff to take the “oath of slander” required by current regulations and requested in the memorandum. Incredibly, then, in the decree of archiving, the opening of a criminal proceeding for slander against the proponent is requested.
Apart from the exceptionality of opening a proceeding of this type following a complaint (which never occurred in our memory and among other things, from journalistic sources, there are several presented by Sato Secretaries who have nothing or even indictment for slander of the plaintiffs), what worries us most is that a person is hit in his capacity as president of a voluntary association who has become the spokesman, in absolute good faith and with constructive intent, of the various requests coming from his own associates and citizens of San Marino in general.

If citizens, in the forms of aggregation permitted to them, can no longer apply to a court to have their rights vis-à-vis the state nominated without risking a title, no association will carry out its activities autonomously in this country and freedom. expression will forever be inhibited.

For our part we intend to reiterate our support and ours to our former president and we ask our associated trust and citizens who believe in justice, solidarity and closeness to our search for truth, clarity and transparency that will continue as before and that we also want to continue with the institutions in the interest of everyone’s health.

We hope that the court decided whether there has been an anomaly of judgment against our President. We believe that this judgment may undermine the guarantee of freedom of expression and manifestation of citizens through voluntary associations, the lifeblood of every civil society.