San Marino. Repubblica Futura insists: “The sole purpose of the majority is to defend the indefensible”
“We are pleased to take note of the joint statement by the majority forces and Denise Bronzetti”.
Meanwhile, it sheds full light on what the “witch hunt” is for some citizen who has had the audacity to send his contributions to the newspapers, specifically to a particular newspaper. Well, it was born from an exposed time (we repeat: an exposition not a “letter”) made by the Secretary of State Roberto Ciavatta, who, evidently, I recover to find free, given that health is going well, has decided to devote himself a little to complaints, after – we recall it en passant – having taken some and came out unscathed (also exploiting his political position to change the board of directors of Cassa di Risparmio and thus affect the procedural process). Well, at least this today is a fact that has been established, black and white by the Director Canzio, who described the “letter” as exposed. We ask most: but in a not too distant debate, was it not Ciava who categorically denied having made a complaint? Were there not several, in the majority and above all on the Net, who stood up indignantly because a judge had investigated people? Perhaps then he should have to respond to our statement not with insults, but by admitting the truth and apologizing: Ciavatta made a complaint! On the basis of that complaint, San Marino citizens were investigated, period.
We come to the investigation. Most, after the trite laudatio of the Manager, affirms: “no table of a procedure that, on the other hand, takes place a table of a procedure that, on the other hand, takes place through the Criminal Chancellery, which of precise criteria”. Well, today it is clear that it was the Manager Canzio who identified the subjects to be investigated and the crimes for which to investigate them, once the complaint from Ciavatta was received. And perhaps – we do not know this because of the “omissis” – among the people on whom a Commissioner of the Law was given a mandate to investigate, there is also Fausta Morganti, towards whom we do not want to dwell in laudationes (she has no need) but in the meantime she had also died, unfortunately, both of which require a very different attitude and respect.
At this point, for the most part someone, if they still have a modicum of modesty and edition in the country, could get up and ask neighbors about what happened and perhaps distance themselves from the statement made yesterday, but we are sure that it will not happen.
Finally, wide compared to the accusations of bitterness, impatience, resentment that the majority has moved us, we admit we have them, all of them, certainly not for having lost our seat (we have shown that we know how to do this too … with style) but because we cannot Tolerate that citizens, on the basis of accusing a Secretary of State, find themselves under investigation, to assume legal fees and to submit to the legal concerns and duties of that status. Against this way of doing we will continue to fight, to tell the truth and to try to understand what happened and if what happened is correct. Moreover: are we really sure that investigations started in this way, towards other citizens, are not yet there? Is there anyone in the majority who wants to go all the way in everyone’s interest? We await answers. We are sure that only new insults and new intimidations will arrive but the strength to fight them is given to us by the increasing number of citizens who contact us to ask us not to give up, to continue defending the rule of law and freedom “.