Prague could lose valuable real estate and land. The transport company sells them without the city’s knowledge, warns Councilor Marvanová
You agreed with the zero side of STAN in the matter of solving the non-transparent management of the company hl. m of Prague, or other property transactions within the city. How do you explain your lack of support in solving these problems?
To be fair, this does not only apply to STAN, but also to the entire Prague City Council, ie to the transport company and some others from the Prague movement itself, as the transport company falls under Prague itself. From the very beginning, I have not succeeded in enforcing the transparent operation of the transport company, there are a number of problems in its operation, but I must say that I was alone in its solution because I had no support. But I’m still working on some of those things.
Which one in particular?
For example, I did not agree with tenders without an open tender, ie JŘBÚ, where large contracts were awarded. Then it was necessary for the transport company to conclude contracts related to various projects related to metro stations and for Prague to lose real estate in the future, which the transport company sells, or promises to sell it without and without the shareholder’s consent.
We don’t even get any information. Even for the former coalition led by Adriana Krnáčová, the council receives this information. I asked for some related information, and there was always a big problem. There is no willingness to receive them.
I have been dealing for a long time with the fact that Prague should not lose valuable real estate and land, because civic amenities or housing can be created on these lands, and I really do not agree that the transport company carries out these transactions without any city intervention and even without informing the city council. or council.