Salernitana decimated by Covid, Colantuono does not appreciate the new protocol: A Naples in 12-13
Salernitana decimated by Covid is preparing the derby against Napoli: Colantuono in the press conference raises questions about the new protocol launched by the Ministry of Health and the FIGC.
There Salerno is experiencing a very delicate moment due to the various positivity at the Covid register in recent days and will present himself at the derby scheduled the day after tomorrow against the Naples with several defections. Today’s situation says that there are 8 positives in the home grenade, given that in the last few hours a new positivity was found but they were negativized because of it: compared to yesterday, when the number did not allow to play the match, the situation has improved and we could take the field.
Stefano Colantuono spoke about Sunday’s match at Maradona focusing on the moment of his team: “These regulations are unclear. Two players have been negativized and we do not know if we can join them to the group because they pass some stress tests as required by the protocol. Another eight have covids and, therefore, will not be available. We add the injuries and the other unavailability it is easy to think that we will leave for Naples with great difficulty. There are things that I cannot understand. We have eight positives at the moment, and we hope that tomorrow there will be no further surprises. Of course we will play, but I would like to emphasize that today we do not have after training. ‘muscle injury, without forgetting the disqualification of Ranieri “.
The granata coach dwelt on the difficulties in preparing for a match like this and also expressed criticism of the new protocol launched by the Ministry of Health and the FIGC: “It’s always difficult. I talked to the guys: we are few, but we have to try to play an important game. We are preparing it well, with obvious difficulties. We didn’t train today, yesterday we didn’t have much stuff to rejoin someone in the group. it’s not worth it, but I just want to understand this penalty. Regulation. I also talked about it after the match against Lazio. The criterion of 35% was not there last week, today they say that if it is missing 9 out of 25 we do not play . But how are negatives without medical fitness considered? We will start in 12-13, with many young players, in the presence of an excellent opponent. They come from a normal week, without midweek rounds of cups. They will have prepared very well, they have recovered Insigne and the task is difficult. We want to represent the city and Salernitana well “.
The new anti-Covid protocol in Serie A has been approved: postponement with 35% of positives in the team
There is one thing more than others that worries the Roman coach in view of the Campania derby: “Having to field players who have not even completed a training session. If muscle injuries occur they risk losing players for subsequent matches, it is not certain that you will recover them in the break. It is a situation at the limit, there are very few changes”.
window._fpcmp.push(function(gdpr) { !function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s) {if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)}; if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0'; n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script', 'https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js'); fbq('init', '2062554930705272'); fbq('track', 'PageView'); //fbq('track', 'ViewContent'); //send custom checkpoints event (function () { var checkPoints = [10, 20, 40, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300].sort(function(a, b) { return a - b; }); //seconds var checkPointIndex = 0; var f = function(){ var data = { instant: checkPoints[checkPointIndex] }; console.log("[FB PIXEL] send custom event ViewContentCheckPoint ", data, " on account " ,"2062554930705272" , " currentTime in seconds ", new Date().getTime() / 1000); fbq('trackCustom', 'ViewContentCheckPoint', data); checkPointIndex++; if(checkPointIndex < checkPoints.length) { setTimeout(f, (checkPoints[checkPointIndex] - checkPoints[checkPointIndex-1]) * 1000) } }; if(checkPoints.length){ setTimeout(f, checkPoints[checkPointIndex] * 1000) } })(); });