History and geography of “Turkey”
He has been discussing from a different context in Turkey for nearly a year. What is meant is the conservatism clustered general view. Turkey also entered into a debate within itself. In general, groups advancing a day in the 1960s to buy adoption in their peripheral vision. used on this occasion the end for the end was a means. The approximation of Turkey from its proximity has facilitated the reshaping of internal conflicts within certain regions. As various European imperial centers were already a resource, and ours could be very powerful. II. It was easy to go through non-national empowerment because they were strongly represented after World War II.
It ended between the influence of liberalism after 1980 and the differences in Turkey. However, after the First Gulf War, the US military, with all your balances in our region. This situation had a lasting effect on groups that are influential in Turkey. A new model of equipment suitable for the budget of the 1960s. The Turkish and Islamic geography of liberalism in the US system will be as follows, and we will reach a wider framework as the ideology of neocolonialism. FETÖ as an organization or group was new signs as the very rapid rise in the 1980s. For the first time, liberal conservatism was strengthened at the grassroots in a multifaceted way. As a conclusion, secularism and religiosity were built as a new fault line in the 1990s. This period continues until 15 July.
CONFLICT BETWEEN GROUPS OPENED TURKEY TO INTERVENTION
Placing the second in its roughest outlines is a separate issue for us, it will be open to hardware in Turkey. He is coming to plan the non-national character of big capital in Turkey. Perhaps, the events in the very rapid rise of FETO by non-national capital circles such as Istanbul and Izmir in the late 1980s are emphasized. The simultaneous and rise of liberal conservatives, both at the grassroots and in the capital circles, There is no side to explaining with internal dynamics. This is new and bigger as we are moving forward to see what dynamics a polarization or major conflict is based on. It was this new polarization that would determine whether Turkey could live on the Eurocentric axis. On the one hand, there were groups led by the non-national government, and on the other, there was a local and national movement in formation. This is a new situation and without losing the validity of the concept in the classical sense.
July 15, a group of members cannot be seen as a conflict with a group. Don’t be descriptive of Turkey’s history as the picture left a purpose. The events that will take place on July 15 also created this.. It is different from the situation that is experienced together with CHP, IP, DEVA, SAADET and that will be in the opinion about meeting Turkey. We have to determine that there is no agenda in this union.
TURKEY IS THE AXIS
With the new economic model, it’s not a very right constraint to let Turkey do the best to release its last money. The very open system with a new economy perspective is the result of an estimation from choosing a model of damage to prices much more.
I think it is transforming into an identity with a point of view based on locality and nationality. The shaker to be delivered at different sites will be applied. We can’t be political, we will be in the army, in many fields on the way, about the lightning target and deep concussions on the way. From the most recent date, we can deal with those who can pass through certain special ideas in our recent histories. In the 1990s, liberal conservatism started to rise with the US dominance in our nearby geography. We are the factor that controls the dynamic deficits of the same geography. This is an idea of the evern nature of contributions. It is very important that the idea of indigenousness and nationality create a contrast.
“It is very important that the concept of Turkey is related to historical events.