San Marino. Revealed in the Council that a “blitz” in the budget was being attempted with the Des
Zeppa: “It is not a secondary aspect that this bill was included in the budget law in order not to make a referendum passage”
Des, the suspicion that it was intended to be included in the budget law to remove it from the possibility of a referendum, is raised by the director of Net, Matthew Zappacritical of the project, even though the possibility of who, how has also come from his political group Glory Archangels, would already be willing to vote for it immediately. “I have heard several people – Zeppa said in the council on Tuesday – to be certain about the goodness or otherwise of the PDL. I’m not sure about this bill. Just with respect to the method, which should be shared, let’s say that the birth of what later became a pdl did not have good starts. Although I have to admit that from the first draft seen – which were quite illegible slides – in March of last year to today, the text, following modifications, is much more exhaustive. It is not complete, because some doubts remain. This Pdl and the desire to have a Des stems from the desire to make it tailored to a person, no matter who he is. And it arises precisely from a wrong assumption, from the moment in which the institutions should take into account what is there, not what any wealthy entrepreneur who wants to do business in San Marino comes to propose. To achieve improvements, my movement sat down at the table, giving advice that was accepted. I’m sorry to say that someone wasn’t present at that table and didn’t contribute to making something better that was perhaps born in the worst way. And it is not a secondary aspect that this Pdl had been included in the budget law, in order not to make a referendum passage (in fact, the budget law cannot be submitted to a referendum, ed). Instead – concludes Zeppa – we need to find ways to protect what exists and not create entrepreneurial dominance by someone”, which is exactly what is being created, according to the opposition in particular.
Right after Sara ContiOf future republic, points out and shares Zeppa’s position: “Rf in these three years – says Sara Conti – has always underlined and stigmatized the lack of proposals by this government for development projects for San Marino. They have not been proposed to date. Today we are asked to look at Des as a turning point and a solution that has finally arrived. Our fear is that all these advisers who support Des by sword, fortunately not many, will be dazzled by a proposal that may be interesting, but which hides many sensitive points. And the impression is that these advisers do so without analyzing all aspects, but on a bias or for convenience. Zeppa’s intervention, which I appreciate because it is a critical position, should be underlined. We cannot afford to support a drawn sword such a project. On the merits, the danger of concentrating enormous power in the hands of a private entity must be underlined, in exchange for the redevelopment of the territory but also the delivery to this entrepreneur of other areas of extreme value. Extreme attention is also paid to non-domiciled tax residences, given how this provision can have a negative impact on the conclusion of the EU agreement”, says Sara Conti.
Article taken from San Marino’s information published in full after 8pm