San Marino. RF attacks NPR: “It’s an electoral cartel set up haphazardly”
“That things inside Npl, pardon, Npr, weren’t exactly idyllic was now clear to everyone”.
You dice it future republiclater defining in a press release We for the Republic such as “the electoral placard set up haphazardly before the elections between fellow travelers who have shown that they sincerely hate each other and have nothing to do with each other except the insane fear of not passing the barrier”.
“Concrete fear that evidently the sympathetic conductor of NPR, Gian Nicola Berti, had already experimented on his skin, helping to bury We of San Marino and managing to be trumped in a previous electoral round – sends Rf -. It is known that unity is strength, and so in political alchemy, socialists, democrats, liberals, right-wing extremist liberals, justicialists, pro-Europeans, sovereignists at the Mistrà, statists, can coexist without embarrassment just to stay attached to the chair. Who knows if Npr’s friends have also made these considerations?
And again: “Today the internal anguish is palpable: it is no longer clear who is with whom, if the PSD is also with the PS, if Pedini Amati will be the man of providence who will no longer run as a candidate, he has been declaring it for months, also not required, but will save the galaxy Npr. However, the two things seem certain: one, that an old lion from the past, famous for having had a little argent de poche at home (a million euros, more or less) and some problems with justice, is still the mentor of the meeting Psd. And, two, that the Psd reunion has taken place, so far, in the Court, in the trial for the famous anonymous letter used to get Iro Belluzzi out of the Justice Commission, tarnishing his reputation and subjecting him to a real political lynching which, in many by now, let’s assume they originated right inside Npr. And so, faced with the striking case of Alessandro Mancini, who became famous during the electoral campaign for making us dream with the cry of ‘we were fine’, effectively erecting a monument to the period of anonymous companies and banking secrecy, when transparency was blasphemy, the bomb exploded. Consistent with the contempt for transparency shown in his electoral campaign, Mancini, entrepreneur and consultant, as he defined himself in his commercials, has refused to dare to apply the councilors’ code of ethics and make his debt positions public. You got it right: the president of the Finance Commission, the one that must, for example, closely follow trivial questions such as the affairs of the State Bank, the foreign debt, the implementation of the NPL project, refuses, the only one among the directors, to make public the debt positions of the companies of which he is a shareholder. Of course, the morbidity of making the facts of others is not at stake here, but only the sacrosanct principle, established by the Greek, which evidently the majority is inspired by alternating current, of avoiding conflicts of interest. The question is simple: in relation to a debtor who is also a member of the Great and General Council, how do the banks to which he is directly or indirectly indebted behave? Or how do banks behave in the face of a director who asks to take out a debt with a bank? As with any citizen or in a ‘particular’ way? Let me be clear, we are not saying that these things have happened in Mancini’s case, we are simply explaining some of the principles on the basis of which the Great and General Council has unanimously added the code of ethics”.
“After various interventions by the opposition”, Repubblica future states that he “asked Mancini to take a step back from the presidency of the Commission in the deafening silence of the majority, the inevitable Gian Nicola Berti launched himself as star performer; fattened up by years of banking and ‘institutional’ consultancy in this legislature, heedless of his constant conflicts of interest so much so that he often speaks in the Council of cases that concern him or the quarrels of his clients, it seemed evidently normal to abandon himself to his inspiration defensive towards Mancini”.
“The arguments were hilarious and worthy of note: first the usual invective about civil servants, then the sensational proposal to publish debts, non-performing loans, tax returns of all San Marino citizens, this time especially civil servants and the Police were targeted Civil, then the somewhat risky affirmation that if Mancini has debts, he is evidently a good politician because he hasn’t stolen (sic!). This would be enough, but in the end Berti outraged with a new invective: the declarations of some Councilors regarding the code of ethics are false! Typical: Is your customer cooked? Throw it in the caciara and maybe you’ll be able to make someone look more guilty than him “, declares Rf.
Finally, RepubblicaFuture says that “it can tolerate the internal quarrels of an agonizing electoral cartel, and also the usual insults from those who have evidently lost all political sense, if they ever had it. It certainly cannot tolerate the dignity and credibility of the Great and General Council being undermined by affirmations that must be thoroughly verified and examined. If Berti knows that some councilor has provided false data, name the names, if instead it is only a low-level game, apologize and draw the consequences for his political career “.