Istanbul Convention abolished, cases of violence increased
Sinan Sardogan, who was the place where a day belt was held as the suspect of the escape of a 65-year-old woman named Arife Gökçe in Tokat, was arrested and jailed for sexual abuse and abuse.
Missing Gökçe sent sexual messages and provoked reactions when Sinan Sardoğan, who was allegedly wandering around the house, sexually abused a 12-year-old.
Presenter Müge Anlı announced that Sardoğan had 23 criminal records, kidnapped women three times, also committed harassment five times, and the only penalty was 19 days for cutting wood without permission. Provisions on women and abuse brought the provisions of the Istanbul Convention back to the agenda. He talked to the President of the 29 October Women’s Association, Lawyer Şenal Sarıhan, regarding the issue of the Republic. Emphasizing the recent spread of sexual abuse and violence cases, Sarıhan said, “The reflections of the idea that the secrecy of the Istanbul Convention is abolished when you actually rule. The gaps created by the understanding that the contract has been abolished cause many incidents of violence. Apart from this, the contract also created opportunities for this type of person to be treated if they had any health problems. The front of these accessories has also been closed.”
He continued Sarıhan as follows: “The approval of the Council of State Chambers also triggered and encouraged a new siege of courage. We see this situation concretely. Legal remedies are not just learning. We have not yet been notified of the decision. If we cannot explain our problem to the Constitutional Court from the notification of the decision, we will go to the Human Rights Court.”
NO FOLLOWING AND FOLLOWING
Sarıhan said, “We want to protect women and children. In fact, we want to protect men as well. “Such incidents prevent moral collapse in a country and prevent people from trusting each other,” he said. Emphasizing the monitoring and follow-up groups of the Istanbul Convention, Sarıhan said, “Despite the eviction, the possibility of re-offending is very strong. The Convention would add strict monitoring mechanisms in this regard. Now it has been saved. The increasing prevalence of femicides, especially in the recent period, is due to the presence of such monitoring. A protection order is taken. Has it been implemented? What does this personal do after it’s implemented? What is the group after implementation? The protection order is lifted. Then the murder takes place. How will this be compensated? It is a process that can only be realized with a serious follow-up.”