what does the schizo-ideological choice lead to?
Columnist Harun Sidorov questions the unstable religious affiliation with political trends. He addresses the problem of the appearance of pop artist Alvin Gray, who declared himself a Bashkir, and now shared that he is Russian.
In the Tatar environment there is a taste and a good joke: “It does not matter what national bride, the main thing was that she was a Tatar.” But a joke is a joke because the joke is understandable for its inconsistency with reality or logic, depending on the situation. However, in the case of court figures of “national culture” this line is lost.
“It doesn’t matter if you are a Tatar or not, the main thing is to be Russian” is the motto of the national policy of the “Russian World” fought among themselvesagitating the wavering for their “national team”.
“I was born in Bashkortostan, my language is Bashkir, my spirit is Bashkir,” proudly declared then, in 2018? one of those people Alvin Gray (Radik Yulyakshin). True, already in 2022 he promised that he would stop singing both in Bashkir and Tatar, and would leave for Moscow in English.
And this week, after returning from a trip to the temporarily occupied territory of Ukraine, he was forced to declare: “We are Russians, we will win. After all, we are now Russians (Bashkirs, Tatars, Chechens, Mari and many others).
This was only once due to discoveries that happened in connection with the likely playing of music in Ukraine.
“Not a thousand and one Poles. On the lookout are the“ brothers ”Romanians, Hungarians and others like them. The vultures have flown. But this trinity, obviously, is for the fact that “the ass is tearing.”
True, the songwriter does not explain why these “thousands of Poles” are not transported in the event of the seizure of the territory of Ukraine, on their territory (in his wild imagination), they transport a referendum to them and annex them to Poland, as the state did, he protects interests.
However, according to the newly-minted “Russian Bashkir” of the war pursued in Ukraine, Russia is by no means the goal of seizing land from her.
We are here to die. Do we understand at home why we are doing this? ?” the singer asks with artistic drama. True, he loses sight of the fact that the public authorities have changed on this issue during the “business trip”.
Indeed, at the beginning of the “special military operation” Putin himself said: “… our plans do not include the occupation of Ukrainian territories” (02/24/2022), “… the appearance of Russian troops near Kyiv or other regions of Ukraine is not connected with the intention occupy this country” (03/16/2022). However, already at the end of the same year, he decided to drop the masks, stating that it was “the appearance of new observations that is a significant result for Russia, the Sea of Azov became an inland sea, even Peter I fought for access to the Sea of u200bu200bAzov.” How do you like that, Alvin Grey?
The Poles and the peoples of the Baltic countries, according to the statement in the text of Greece, did not capture the interests of Ukraine and did not proclaim the whole world, which is considered such a capture as a significant achievement for themselves. It is precisely those who call themselves Russians who do this, identifying this with an orientation towards natural nature and native culture, and with the schizo-ideology of the “third world war”, which was also proclaimed in its text by the newly appeared Russian language.
About the acquisition price for the Russian people themselves is ironic wrote Russian Tatarstan Mark Shishkin.
“The Russian people have now been enriched by the great Alvin Gray. The cherished dreams of human Russificationists and current fighters against the multinational have come true. We are waiting for dear Radik at Karavon, at Sviyazhskaya Ukha, at the Boratynsky Museum, and at the sites of the Christmas readings,” he quipped.
The meaning is clear – for people like Mark (this is his church name). However, Russians of Putin’s call like Yulyakshin do not stick to this or any other possible version of Russian ethnic culture, and often continue to live in private life in their ethnic culture. Therefore, their Russianness turns out to be not an ethnic, ideological choice, a scaling that in the religious “Russian World” leads to the identification of Russianness with a criminal ideology, with all the ensuing consequences for its bearers.
At the same time, the Russian right to responsibility for the fruits of this ideology is subsequently removed from the current legal topics in Russian, for whom Russianness is simply their ethnicity and culture, and not “that’s all”, hardly any chances of success.
Because this ideology is subsequently found primarily among the representatives of the Russian people, from Putin and his entourage, and is retained by his majority, and only while the “new Russians” are in their field of distribution. But for the non-Russian peoples, such an accession of opportunists from among them to the majority in the proposed perspective is just beneficial, since it is possible in the future to deliver a stable result between the countries of criminal policy in their midst and topics who have made an imperial, and not their national choice.
The point of view of the authors, the articles are covered under the heading “Opinions”, low-quality assessment of the editors.
Subscribe to our channel at Telegram. What to do if your Idel.Realii website is blocked read here.