Law and Democracy with Levent Köker (83): Turkish politics and HDP voters after HDP Congress
HDP became an industry on 3 July. There is the case of HDP’s place in the first place. The case seems to have come to the decree. It has a poor track record in Turkey’s class situation. It was implemented as a violation of human rights, with the exception of Welfare rights, without integrating the HDP as the AYM should have given. If the Constitutional Court gives a new law decision of HDP, is it a violation for this or after a second isna from RP? The intent of a party used in relation to this person will be taken from an assessment for “expressing the people”, in the target of a party that has received 47% of the votes in the overall elected. A similar situation is the word for word for HDP. According to the public opinion polls, the 10% threshold can be easily reached, “as a party, let P’s help you make a choice of over 8 million as of now. This surplus does not mean “closing” this constituency of any election.
Speeches delivered at the Congress also influence the themes of these scenes. In this context, I would like to mention the warning that choosing an election election and the result of HDP voter base should be evaluated very well in Turkish politics. In addition to this, it is noteworthy that the voters who voted/will vote for the HDP stuttered a great misconception, which is thought to be “cenadaism”. Mithat Sancar states that HDP did not enter the CB election with its own candidates in the election to be elected, in the elections in an open and transparent election, and HDP in the underdeveloped elections and not being determined. This will strengthen the odds of the CB pick going to the runoff, and it will never tell how the runoff will turn out. In a similar vein, the prediction of Selâhattin Demir that the CB, which may be in an election similarly to the HDP, will be ahead by a clear 80-20%, is also included in Sancar’s assessment. This development should add serious measurement in the target point of the CB’s selection in the first competition.
The HDP – within the opposition, especially the “6/opposition” – is timid if it is assertive on the face of it. This “alliance” to help those who prefer to stay as far away as possible from HDP is what will be considered as a privilege to be preferred. It is important to understand that the HDP elections are not an election that will lead to the election of a “government election”, but rather the re-election of Turkey as a democratic republic. I don’t know what kind of training “6 opposition” is. It is obvious that in their speeches, building an old new system rather than going back to the past is used. The difference is in the discussion between the “new” and the “reinforced parliamentary system” that HDP will offer, and the “democratic rebuilding” of HDP, and the intersection and point of the two dilemmas honestly ostensibly to enter into a problem of convergence.
We doubt that some of them are in such a situation. At the beginning, there is a perception about HDP created by the “war on terror”. There has to be a good Party in the “6 opposition”. Tonight, I am the “My Turkey” that Selâhattin Demirtaş has spoken against the HDP, this image is broken as an experience on the way. On the other hand, there is Demirtaş’s “Kurdish expansion”, which I think is directed against the “6 opposition”. With the delivery in the Congress, the evaluation due to a burden applied to the HDP in the evaluation of these elections: According to the examination of the wrong perception about it by the political judge from the side of an election, the real and resolved life high minors of the Kurdish application suitable for us cannot be given by the user – for example, education in their mother tongue. may be a necessity – to tell. To be able to bring the two together is really a job that requires a lot of effort. HDP has met the requirements of this heavy burden before its voter base. Now it’s time to tell it with one’s own mouth. “Listen to 6 ears” will also be a repetition of what we mean by being in a new system that will be the repetition of the old one, in an understanding of comparing Turkey. The HDP Congress has also clearly laid out the terms on which the basis for such a preparation can be formed. At the beginning, there is a comprehensive awareness of the Kurdish issue. It has various options on one side, such as the Kurdish people, which is reflected in Turkish politics because of the HDP, on the other side. This will be discussed in future programs.