The Loch Ness monster is nothing more than a “whale penis”
Just hearing him call again “monster” it makes us sad, so much so that for everyone the tenant of Loch Ness has become over time Links. We are talking about the mysterious creature which according to legend populates the freshwater mirror of the Scottish highlands, position a southwest of Inverness. Over the years many have tried to dare more and more less scientific, but all or less credible on the origin and nature of this strange creature, but all destined to be wrecked miserably.
Now we would be facing the umpteenth theory about the famous Nessie. He would have formulated it Michele Dolce, by profession “professor of molecular ecology” All’University of Derby, United Kingdom, that with a post on his Twitter account: he would approach the “creature” to a whaleor rather to one part of it. In short, according to the new hypothesis, Nessie would be nothing more than: “the penis of a whale”. A theory certainly destined for raises a crawl spaceif only the bold professor he has forgotten, perhaps taken from the emphasis of his discovery, that Nessie would live in a lake. So definitely narrow and fresh water that I don’t think befits the cetacean to which it is approached.
Says Michael in his post: “In the past, travelers and explorers they drew what they saw. That’s why a lot of sea monster stories popped up with tentacles and appendages that emerged to the surface, making them fear that there was some sinister being underneath. However, in many cases, they were alone whale penis. “sea monsters”surely in reality they were none other than body parts of other animalsor in any case completely explainable phenomena.
What remains inexplicable for us is the fact of how he could say that Nessie was the penis of an animal that has always populated i seas and not lakes…. this might be enough a to collapse all the hypothesis castle?