PSD, CDS, IL and Chega at the Lisbon Municipal Assembly with topics on suspension of local accommodation – Observer
The deputies of the PSD, CDS-PP, IL and Chega at the Municipality of Lisbon expressed doubts and legal objections this Wednesday regarding the proposal to amend the PS for the “immediate suspension” of new accommodation registrations in the Local Assembly in the capital.
Following the opinion of the Lisbon Chamber’s legal services, the PS group in the Municipal Assembly presented a proposed amendmentthe same was advanced by the socialist councilors and approved in the Chamber, but with doubts and legal objections from the municipal deputies of PSD, CDS-PP, and Chega remaining on the issue of the IL issue. proportionality and the principle of freedom of economic initiative.
At this Wednesday’s meeting of the 5th Permanent Commission on Housing and Local Development and Municipal Works, the deputies unanimously approved the an addendum to the report on the proposal which aims to approve the municipal entrance, the beginning of the procedure for amending the local regulation at the entrance of the Local Accommodation, as well as the approval of the local regulation at the entrance of the Municipal Assembly to the suspension of the authorization of new registrations for the immediate creation of accommodation in force of the regulation.
During the course of the work of this committee on the proposal on local accommodation, “it is noted that continuation of doubts and objections related to it, namely as related to point 4, by the following forces, PSD, IL, CDS-PP, and the same proposals are proposed and are not taking place in the plenary”.
This addendum to the report, which had already been approved on 31 January, also attaches the opinion of the legal services of the Lisbon Chamberdocument that motivated the postponement of the discussion and voting of the proposal in the Municipal plenary, which was scheduled for February 8.
The Legal Department of the Lisbon Chamber, which the Lusa agency had, concludes that “either the delimitation of the access containment areas AC), or the demarcation of the specifically delimited areas (AED), as well as their implications or repercussions, from the outset, on the principle of freedom of economic initiative, which is mandatory as necessarily inherent in the figures.pass the proportionality test’ and that an immediate initiative was not intended to maintain the subjective and legally protected rights of those proposed for the suspension in progress in the suspension data course”.
At issue is point 4 of the immediate visa “submit to the Assembly the Plaintiff’s Assembly registration of the local accommodation establishment, for a period of period, without prejudice to the proposal of its proposal for the same period, until its proposal comes into force for an equal period, until its proposal for the amendment to the Municipal Local Accommodation Regulations to come into force”.
Furthermore, this point states that the measure is planned to be “in homogeneous tourist areasunder monitoring, a ratio between the number of well-known local accommodation establishments and the number of permanent dwellings equal to 2.5%, the parishes, in whole or in part, where the city is located in whole or in part, where there is a ratio between the number of local accommodation establishments and the number of dwellings equal to or greater than 2.5%, without prejudice to the permanent containment zones in force”.
The proposal in terms of the initiative approved by the municipal authority, which is approved in the same way, whether the course of regulation, the terms of the terms of the terms and the regulation of the Assembly of the housing measure where the number of frequencies where there are 5 local accommodation ratios and a number of dwellings equal to or greater than %, current or that will verify the course of the suspension”, without prejudice to the containment zones in force.
At this Wednesday’s permanent meeting at the 5th Commissione, PSD deputies claim that “there are legal objections they represent” on the retention of new housing records, from the CDS-PP local identity on how to define the concept of the neighborhood.
IL questioned, taking into account “if there are legal or economic doubts, how can a political debate be held when the base is poorly made”, and from Chega they were made “as doubts about the legality of this proposal”.
The deputies do PS considers an amendment to the proposal itself “is a redundancy and that it “is able to go to the plenary”, arguing that “there are many opinions”, expressing “many doubts” in relation to the opinion of the legal services of the Chamber, referring to questions of legality fall to the Constitutional Court.