The analysis of the report of the Commission of Inquiry on the San Marino banking and financial system could not have had a more grotesque result. Once again the agenda produced by the bosses of the majority has completely distorted the results of the work of the Commissioners and has come to question in black and white real falsehoods, both conceptual and factual. Some examples. The vaunted “profound process of renewal and distancing carried out by the parties of Christian Democrat and Socialist inspiration” which according to the majority – therefore also of the Network! – inserting “profoundly changed objectives and strategic choices compared to those made from the 90s to 2008” has materialized in reality putting in the Christian Democratic choice to put in the Government in 2008, in the Secretariat of the Cats that perhaps some small responsibility in the project of the square San Marino financial company and in the happy release of banking licenses he had … Gatti, who, only thanks to the pinning of the then AP, was ousted by the Government. And perhaps the majority has also forgotten how among its ranks there is still a dc exponent who distributed – at the time – some banking licenses and that the much-maligned CIS Bank was the main sponsor of the friendship party for many years to come. after 2010 … What about the total forgetfulness about the fact that the then AP and also the UPR did not vote on the appointment of Grais in the Council and even Antonella Mularoni then noted the absence of Grais requirements, expressing her opposition to the assignment? Or the daring reconstruction of the 2016 government crisis, which for the current majority is attributed to different visions between DC and PA on the AQR? It is a pity that we are said to speak of A open QR in October when the crisis was already in July, Crisis goes total to the fact that AP asks for the Cassa di Risparmio, as recommended by the IMF, something against which the DC fought strenuously at the cost of running into fall of the government. What about the accusations against the government of Ora.sm – the current majority’s favorite argument to mask its own inadequacy and cover up unconfessable, perhaps those of a clique that controls it? – ever accuse circumstantial or even false? Such as that of not having constituted the civil party against Savorelli and Co. (false: given that the Government of Ora.sm wrote several times to the State Attorney’s Office to request such a constitution and the same Attorney replied by suggesting to wait for any referrals to judgment, as per practice); or that of not having opposed that management of the Central Bank (obviously pretending not to notice that RF not only did not want Grais and Savorelli, but that even from the month of March to raise the question of their inadequacy)? Or again the description of a mythological character, Catia Tomasetti, President of the Central Bank who, after the first report of the Commission of Inquiry, was hailed as the hero who had killed the forces of evil (Banca CIS), and who this time, although without ever being named, is she allusively accused – at least by some majority interventions and by some passages of the agenda – of having plotted to sell off the Delta (in short: heroine of good or genius of evil)? What can we say about the fact that the advisor-lawyer Gian Nicola Berti is once again strenuously defending Asset Banca (who would hopefully see even the slightest responsibility on the part of Stefano Ercolani, his client!); what about the roundup of bad guys drawn up by the majority in which a whole grass is made into a bundle for the simple pleasure of discrediting one now on the other? In short: a surreal farce that evidently did not even like the majority itself because, between dissenting interventions and abstentions, the votes on such a bizarre document were only 32 and not 44. Repubblica Futura had presented a reconstruction that seems more realistic to us ( every citizen will be able to read the report and agendas and their own idea!), and above all make up and protect the interests of Cassa di Risparmio and the Republic, especially in light of the new decisions taken by the Court of Forlì; 2) make known the names of politicians with significant debt positions and understand if positions have been created by favoritism and wrong methods of disbursement of credit that may have favored even current policies and at the same time its political action. Unfortunately on this last point DC, Rete, Motus Liberi and a part of what remains of NPR have done and said no. Congratulations to all! We ask ourselves why and we will continue this battle for transparency and legality.

cs Repubblica Futura