Judicial system, law approved

ANTONIO FABBRI – “Animus in consulendo liber” is the expression carved in the architrave of one of the access doors of the Council Chamber of the Public Palace. And so much “liber”, a feeling of the interventions made in the final debate
of the constitutional law on the judiciary, it must not have been the mind of at least a dozen councilors. The exponents of Domani Motus Liberi grumble, but, also given their professions, they adapt despite the fact that they fear the prospect of being discharged by the majority, now that the 39 votes are no longer needed. Then they hold their noses and vote with the DC, as declared for his group by Michela Pelliccioni. But the most disturbing claims come from the Mixed Group (…)

Article taken from L’Informazione

Full article by Antonio Fabbri published after 11pm

“Animus in consulendo liber” is the expression carved in the architrave of one of the access doors of the Council Chamber of the Palazzo Pubblico. And so much “liber”, to hear the interventions made in the final debate of the constitutional law on the judiciary, must not have been the soul of at least a dozen councilors.

The exponents of Domani Motus Liberi grumble, but, also given their professions, they adapt despite the fact that they fear the prospect of being discharged by the majority, now that the 39 votes are no longer needed. Then they hold their noses and vote with the A.D, as stated for his group by Michela Pelliccioni.

But the most disturbing claims come from the Mixed group, which nevertheless adapts and votes in favor. The fact remains that the intervention on the vote of Denise Bronzetti, which is very significant. “It is with very little serenity of mind that the mixed group, for which I am making the declaration of vote, is preparing to vote on this law”, he began. And then he explained the reason for the concern and, after having retraced the last few years which he said had been heavy, he added law and on who will have to make it walk in particular in relations between the powers of the State: “we want to put the trust that frankly wobbles, which frankly wobbles a lot, because as much as we manage to make good laws, the laws walk on people’s legs … and frankly, we didn’t like what happened in these last few days in these last hours in this classroom at all and we still don’t like it at all. And we are free people, even if sometimes someone wants to pass us off as criminals, but we are free people. So the calls that come from many sides for a favorable judgment, we do not like. We vote if we believe that it is right to do so, because we believe in our power which is the legislative one, but it is not certain to legislate as someone likes and wants. And we need to start on this to be all very clear. In here and out of here. In here and out of here, ”he repeated. “This is an appeal, it is a reminder that we feel we can address to the classroom, because also in the next few days we will have to face important issues for the stability of our state, of our public accounts. And not only that: once again the policy called to shed light on aspects that alas they have had to have, even in the court and with the court ”.

In short, a clear denunciation of external pressure to vote on the law. Before Bronzetti’s intervention they had made their statements free And Future Republic. “We absolutely do not recognize ourselves in this law which was not supposed to be just the law of government and majority – said the group leader of free Eva Guidi – We have highlighted critical issues that we will soon touch and who knows if we will be able to review them, being a constitutional law. We therefore express our total opposition and, with the utmost respect towards the Regency and the Chamber, we announce that we will not participate in the vote and we will not even be present in the Chamber ”.

so Nicola Renzi, parent company of Rf: “Since the legislature, this has done everything by the majority of the process of the century, the Mazzini account, to occupy, with appointments made in the solitude of the majority alone, the Guarantor College and for clear ethnic cleansing in court and the interests of friends, friends or clients. We cannot and do not want to take part in this vote. The irreversible responsibility for what we have discussed today must fall clearly on each councilor who will carry it forward and support it. It is not a criminal responsibility, but a responsibility of conscience and politics. Many of you realize and how you carry the weight of this responsibility, but prefer that the battles be fought by others. We did not shirk, despite intimidation and mockery ”, and also Rf she left the classroom. All in favor, with different nuances, the explanations of vote of the other group leaders who in any case expressed bitterness – it is difficult to say whether hypocritical or sincere – at the exit of the opposition from the classroom.

Like this Manuel Ciavatta for the A.D, Gian Nicola Berti for NPR, Alberto Giordano Spagni Reffi for net, Besides Rossano Fabbri, of the mixed group member of the opposition who supported the goodness of the law.

The vote, removed the opposition that did not participate, saw the approval of the Constitutional Law with 43 votes in favor. Then approved – 37 in favor and 8 against – also the qualified Law on the Justice Affairs Commission, whose debate was quickly resolved, also because it was now considered a useless and illogical law by the opposition.

Giuseppe Morganti from free he spoke of a “black afternoon for the institutions of the Republic”.