WC Qualification 2022: Croatia – Slovakia 2: 2. Individual evaluation
12.10.2021 07:05
|
Slovak footballers also lost their mathematical chance to advance to the World Cup 2022 in Qatar. The Croatian leaders twice led the world vice-champions, the VAR saved them from loss. The ride on the roller coaster of performances continued with a satisfactory performance. Who pleased more and who less?
Read also
VIDEO: Slovakia was working on a small miracle today. He sank us in the rainy Croatia …
Marek Rodak – 6
On rugged terrain, everything from long-range missiles to a small home smelled at risk. He collected from the first end when he reached for the ball, but did not kick it out of the goal area. In the first half, Pašalič’s not 100% finishes out of the top five. After the second goal, he rightly whispered when his wall broke. He managed the obligatory interventions on the soggy lawn, in addition, the above-standard did not offer them.
Peter Pekarík – 4
The synergy of the Pekarík – Šatka – Kucka triangle haproved, the right blew. Perišič did not have to think of anything extra for Pekarík, it was enough for him to achieve it. The veteran with a meager load in Herth no longer had a chance on paper. Before the first goal, we will misjudge the situation and for the Croats we will extend to the scoring Kramarič. In places, he did not confirm vast experience. He didn’t even make an offensive sign to help, when in the 10th compare he modernly completed the attack and won the corner. Tarkovic missed the opportunity to try out the more promising Koscelnik.
Lubomir Satka – 6
After the European Championships, the expected transition to a better competition did not come. Although he leads the Polish league with Poznan, he does not play difficult European matches. And even in the national team, it was as if his flight alongside Škriniar had stopped. He leaves too much responsibility to a colleague in the startup or organization. Perišič made the evening a little less unpleasant than Pekarík’s. In the first goal he missed the scoring Kramarič, Scarf is observed in the lime without preparation.
Milan Skriniar – 7.5
He served in air and physical battles. Traditionally, they try to be a leader, in some places the division of tasks in defense and cooperation with Šatko did not work. They used Kramarič and Pašalič. During the passes from the sides, they bounced from the goal, when Modrič had the ball, they broke the defense with their runs. There were 3-4 chances or hints. Škriniar and Almási returned to the pupils’ days when they released an equalizing goal in the wall.
David Hancko – 8
It fits a discount to Škriniar, possibly in the future also under construction with three stoppers. He gave a serious international performance in Osijek. In the first result, twice from behind in the sixteen, he exclusively removes home aces. He worked as a surgeon, although he hesitated twice during the excavation. He pushed forward energetically, although he pulled the hand unnecessarily a few times and handed the ball to Škriniar. He becomes an important member of the defense.
Juraj Kucka – 5
“He’s like Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde,” says expert Ladislav Borbély in Russia in an interview with ŠPORT.sk. He has been performing two-part performances in the representation for a long time. Good moments are negated by lapses. With traditional energy supplied by juice, important especially in offensive pressing. Start Almási in front of the goal center. He also had many unnecessary losses bordering on laxity. He often overestimates his football. A direct kick after a foul on Modrič was not forced. Towards the qualification for the European Championship 2024, it was time, as with Pekarík, to leave the place at least in the basic group to the younger ones.
Read also
Cowardly qualification? The end of Tarkovich? Borbély: Let’s learn the truth
Patrik Hrosovsky – 6
He framed the first end with two naive losses, the Slovaks escaped unharmed. Already after the first increased vigilance and the ball, the feet are given. The performance went up after Hamšík’s departure, when he took on more responsibility in the defense phase and cooperates better with Ber. He set his limited standard. He did not approach Lobotka’s set bar in this position.
Marek Hamsik – 6
Schranz’s goal center set the strictest criteria. Sharp and rotated into the space where the goalkeeper can, but 9 out of 10 do not dare. Physically, he is no longer the same player as 3-5 years ago, no overview, creativity and copying techniques is especially unique. He started with an injury, which may have affected performance and was an unnecessary risk related to the nature of the meeting. At 41. use alternately by grasping the back thigh muscle.
Ivan Schranz – 8
He rode in both directions like a motorcycle. He saved the baker in the back with even more serious problems. He was rehabilitated for burnt tutovky in Russia, when he won the standard in the sub-number and ended up elusive with a sharp head. He constantly attacked and pushed the fasteners to the press. He was not afraid of responsibility, he tried to penetrate. In the final third he was no longer effective in the front, he also showed willpower in defense.
Read also
Dissatisfaction and disappointment with the qualification. The head of SFZ Kováčik also comments on the position …
Ladislav Almasi – 7.5
One performance poured more hope than the predecessors on the sensitive bed throughout the qualification. Breast or leg ball and constructive trigger? No problem. Extend your head into the open? A problem, but for the unexpectedly unexpected winning duel. Show strength, technique and speed. He is constantly offered in the combined or free space, he centered for Haraslín’s goal. A concept with an offensive attack that is not a clumsy hulk can work. However, only 22-year-old Almási needs to work on himself and gain quantum experience at the club and international level.
Lukáš Haraslín – 7
Does anyone remember when the last time both wings operated in Slovakia? The goal showed balance when he had an overview of the goalkeeper and scored. He allowed himself more than in the last matches and responsibly helped Hanck with the defense. However, there must be more penetrations and non-traditional solutions. Conversely, the bad habit must disappear when the first thought after gain is directed at one’s own goal. It was not a stellar performance, no rebound to the next program.
Matúš Bero – 6
The burden of responsibility for the play spread among several after his arrival instead of Hamšík. He brought even more fighting spirit, dynamism and, compared to the captain, more defensive will to the middle of the field. Unlike Dud or Rusnák, he completes an attack from the second wave or in the sixteenth. The team worked very well for 15-20 minutes. Hamšík’s um was a bit missing in the last half hour, Bero had a problem with opening games.
Martin Koscelník – 5
As several times under Tarkovič, Pekarík came to the right. He helped dampen the locals’ efforts for final pressure. He and Ber were at a goal of 2: 3, saved by VAR. He got to the only action ahead when he sent an unaddressed center in cooperation with Schranz.
Erik Jirka – no rating
He joined in 85. Requires.
Read also
How do you rate Hamšík, Škriniar or Kuck? Mark the performances of our in the match …