Buriani-Celli trial, comparison on what to keep in the file after the Third Instance sentence
Powerful, as expected, the impact of judgment of the Judge of Third Instance Oliviero Mazza on the process, in line aa charged to the former Secretary of State for Finance Simone Celli ee to the commissioner of the law Alberto Buriani. The proceeding, initiated on the basis of a complaint by the Commission of Inquiry on Cis Bank in relation to the legal matter involving the President of the Central Bank Catia Tomasetti – the civil party and the well-known Italian politician Sandro Gozifor a advice in favor of the latter which ended with a archivinghe was confronted at this hearing with a ruling that he orders the unusability of seizure evidence without identifying a time period and without the use of keywords.
In detecting how the provision delimited the perimeter of the hearing, the Civil Parties, the Tax Prosecutor and the defenses substantially discussed what can be held and should be eliminated from the file. For the plaintiffs, the acquisition of the registration of the phone call with Gianfilippo Dughera, as a priova of the alleged partiality of Alberto Buriani. But together with the defenses it is the same Tax attorney to remember the peremptory nature of a sentence to be respected: therefore full return of the computer files. The judge is reserved for the decision.
Among the preliminary exceptions, the lawyers of Celli and Buriani asked that only the deposition which, as testified, Catia Tomasetti and Sandro Gozi will hold during the trial, considering those made in June and July unusable from the BCSM president and the well-known Italian politician. The trial, in which they are also accused Carlo Filippini And Antonio Fabbridirector and editor of the newspaper L’Informazione, accused of publication of secret documents relating to criminal proceedings, is updated to October 26th.