Port of Marina di Pisa, no building permits
In a press release, Una Città in Comune and Rifondazione Comunista declare: “Porto Marina di Pisa: no building permit has been deposited. For the municipal offices, the urbanization works must be carried out before the houses”
In recent days, the Marina Development Corporation announced in triumphal tones that the request for a building permit had been filed in the Municipality for the construction of the first of 3 lots for 7 thousand square meters with 38 luxury apartments, gyms, swimming pools, spas, restaurants, a club.
The company, managed by the Namira sgr real estate fund, took over from Boccadarno to carry out the real estate investment adjacent to the port.
Thanks to our request for discussion filed last February, on Monday 10 October the topic was finally discussed in the First Permanent Council Commission, and once again a very different reality has emerged.
In fact – according to when reported by the municipal offices – on Monday no request for building permit was filed by the company, either for private construction or the SUAP.
But not only. Thanks to our initiative, it has clearly emerged that we are facing a further forcing by the private subject, also carried out with a press campaign.
In fact, according to what was declared by the municipal offices themselves, the first building permit must be related to the urbanization works that are still missing, as it has not been built or implemented, but neither tested nor tested.
This is very different from the request that the company, which wants to start immediately from real estate realizations.
Finally, we remind you that to date the settlement agreement with the Municipality for the purchase of the municipal areas has not even been signed, and in the meantime Namira has appealed to the TAR against the Municipality validity on the Recovery Plan, with the aim of asking a variant, which is not allowed today since the Recovery Plan has expired.
A strategy that still casts heavy shadows on Namira’s real intentions and the future of that area.
Once again – as we have been reiterating for years – the clash between private and public interests reappears, with the private individual interested exclusively in the speculative operation of constructing luxury residential buildings, which has nothing to do with the public interests of redevelopment and revitalization of the coast.
A city in common
Communist Refoundation