San Marino. Criticism of Repubblica Futura on the actions of the San Marino government
“By paying attention to some of the latest resolutions issued by the government, we can have a clear insight into the bad way of governing that they have been carrying out for almost three years. We summarize it in 4 principles ”.
Thus writes Repubblica Futura which goes to list:
“THE WASTE OF MONEY
First of all, the waste of money to make a lot of people travel for free, taking advantage of every opportunity: resolution no.4 of 3 October last provided for the participation of 7 people, including 2 belonging to the political staff of the Secretariat of State to Education, 2 Secretaries of State and the President of the Foreign Affairs Commission, to participate in the celebrations of the 30th anniversary of relations between San Marino and Croatia; event is important, for which however (in times of economic hardship) perhaps a smaller delegation would have been enough.
But this is just an example, since there has been this Government every trip has been like this (we could mention the many trips of Pedini, the trips of Canti and Belluzzi, etc …), with huge delegations (often integrated also by the inevitable members of the ” dream team “of the communication of clear government faith) to accompany the secretaries of state who, we believe, could very well get by on their own: but how can you deny a trip at the expense of the state to your loyalists?
THE FAVORITE
Let’s move on: favoritism. Resolution No. 43 of last 26th announced that the ISS had signed a collaboration agreement with the counselor / lawyer Gian Nicola Berti in September for “support for a disciplinary”: a maximum cost of € 7,500. As always, the preparatory acts for these positions are not visible, because transparency for this Government is an optional: therefore no one knows what procedure we are talking about, because the ISS is not able to manage it internally and above all how the external professional who will have to support the ISS. We only see that a counselor / lawyer of most can enjoy a good assignment, to be added to all the others. What would have happened if the much-maligned previous government did?
THE “CRACKS”
Another modus operandi: the creation of “cliques” that allow the government (and the people he appoints) to dominate. With resolution no. 41, again of 26 September last, the Government proceeded to appoint the members of the core of assessment and monitoring of the performance of the ISS executives, provided for by a recent Decree on which RF had also expressed interest and attention, aware of the But strong members that the nucleus are third persons with respect to the dynamics of the ISS. Well, who are the members that the government has appointed, without speaking to anyone? Apart from the President (Dr. Carlo Matterazzo), two of the other 3 members are among the consultants that the Director General of the ISS, Bevere, has brought with him to San Marino since he arrived, and which San Marino has continued to pay for months. , it is not clear what to do. Any evaluation regarding the impartiality of the evaluation thus goes to be blessed, but the important thing is that Bevere and his “group” have assignments after assignments, since everyone is doing a disaster on health. We seem to go back to the times of Savorelli, who had “colonized” Bcsm …
THE ABSENCE OF TRANSPARENCY
Fourth theme: the total absence of transparency, as already reported above. With resolution no. 19 also of 26 September, the Government sends the Government Mayors and the Secondary Finance Secretary to sign the agreement between the State and the banks for the creation and maintenance of a securities market, in order to guarantee the negotiation of public debt securities. An absolutely relevant issue, on which not only a preliminary discussion would be needed, but of which the country should be made aware. Well, the text of this agreement is not known, it is “placed on the record” of the session: which means that in order to serve a complicated procedure for accessing the records.
But with this government it is always like this, in every resolution: elements and acts of great importance to understand what is being done, what is being signed, etc. if in the past legislature there are “attachments” to the resolutions (thus being simply by downloading the attachment from the site), now they are always “placed on record”, so no one sees them.
That of transparency is a battle of some forces of the current majority, as can be seen totally forgotten.
CONCLUSIONS
Four resolutions taken as an example, among many, to show the principles with which this government is managing the country. A method that we strongly denounce as unacceptable, and that we want to change as soon as this government has the decency to free the country from its harmful presence ”.