TTB moved to Istanbul facility: Unstable
ANKARA – The Turkish Medical Association (TTB) surrendered in the lawsuit filed by the 10 Chambers of the Council of State against the annulment of the Istanbul Convention.
It was stated that the TTB, which belongs to the Council of State Administrative Litigation Chambers, applied to the 90th and 104th Conventions of the Constitution, and was given a human rights and administration mandate.
‘UNLAWFUL’
In the application, in which it is explained in the decision of the 10th Chamber of the Council of State that the legal negotiation of the action, which is the subject of the case, is carried out with the discussion of salt authority,
“Therefore, the unconstitutional use of ‘it cannot be done in appropriateness’ in the decision was made by expanding the constitutional criterion with interpretation. The lawsuit is against the law in terms of subject and purpose, and it should be possible to make a dairy operation against the elements of the selection of the Chamber.
It is not evaluated by the evaluation of the enjoyment of the rights chosen by the election.
VALUES CANNOT BE COMMITTED TO VALUE JUDGMENTS: It can be designed to be social, economic and useful, and to derive a human rights perspective on the current conditions within the knowledge of the practices that will be seen in benefiting from the public – that is, its education. Values cannot be sacrificed to value judgments. With such an understanding, its creation cannot be expected to reveal justice. The justice of this decision taken from the judgments of this judiciary cannot be expected. It cannot be expected that this decision, taken over value judgments, will take into account the benefit of society.
WE REQUEST THE DECISION TO BE OVERFLOWED: Since our case is a case that has a right to a life without violence, with monetary issues and borders, it is not just a case without a struggle with trainings for small-scale industrial and comprehensive workload. It is a requirement of the clear parental implementation of the constitutional regulation. It is important that the public benefit from judicial processes and participate in the evaluation, the transparency of the efficiency of the evaluation, and the arbitrariness of the evaluation in evaluation. It is one of the fair trial requirements of our acceptance to complete this improvement. It was requested that the voices of the process, which is the subject of the appeal review, did not compete, and that the relevant decree was unconstitutional, and the Constitutional Court was annulled through a lawsuit.
BACKGROUND OF THE CASE
The “Convention of the Council of Europe on the Prevention and Combating of Violence Against Women and Domestic Violence”, as the Istanbul Convention in the public opinion, was annulled by the Republic of Turkey with the publication of the President’s Decision in the Official Gazette on March 20, 2021.
Do not go after this, with the request to cancel their plans and decide on the season’s decision, many non-governmental designs of the Turkish Medical Association, bar associations and member organizations have created many cases in the Council of State.
The 10 Chambers of the Council of State rejected their requests for requests in cases, and considered their request for annulment as an action.
Prosecutor of the trial, “If a transaction has been duly reconstructed, it must be duly terminated. The termination of an agreement, which will be decided upon by the approval of the yet, will be lifted by the decision of which decision is deemed appropriate by the law of approval of the yet.” On the other hand, the Council of State rejected the applications for the cancellation of the contract in groups. (WALL)