San Marino. Libera replies to NPR: “You, wrapped in chaos, never have a univocal position on the big questions about the future of the country”
Replica of Libera a Noi per la Repubblica.
“We for the Republic it’s a very special diverse group – dice Free at the beginning of the note -. Divided into many sub-components ranging from the reformist to the extreme right, it never has a leftivist position on the big questions concerning the country’s future. Moreover, the ensemble that ranges from convinced Europeanists to the skeptical defenders of the prerogatives that have ruined the Republic, passing through the indifferent defenders of the debt, could not exhibit more convincing than those capable of identifying a and unleashing the fatal wrath against it, to hide their internal flaws and the disarming absence of any prospect, if not that of supporting the Christian Democrats ”.
“This time the enemy on which to make one’s spears converge is Libera with the position taken on the question of justice – claims the opposition party -. Well, one or more spears that broke on the shield of coherence that Libera demonstrated by declaring the end of a government which, having lost the consent of public opinion, was judged no longer capable of managing the numerous emergencies affecting the country , among these of the justiceit has become a battleground not so much political, but of opposing groups of power ”.
Furthermore, Libera says that he “worked so that neither of the two opposing sides in the Court prevailed over each other, since each bearer of critical evidence” and “contributed with their own documents and amendments to improve, as far as it was difficult due to the absolute closure of the secretariat for justice unable to give the texts of the reforms in such a way as to give concrete answers to the Greek, warning him of the differences encountered in understanding the balance between powers in a small state “.
And again: “Libera’s position, in stark contrast to all the strong powers who tried to put their hands on the Court, is probably all too transparent and linear for those who brandish their compendiums of law as if they were cleavers to annihilate who is not an illustrious client to destroy studies, or for who hides behind carnations withered by scandals and personal failures. Or even for those who forget to travel with heavy Cartier bags filled with money and the future stolen from the new generations ”.
Despite all this, “Noi per la Repubblica attacks us by saying that we have gone backwards”, says Libera, who finally comments as follows: “How does a line-up like NPR understand whether one is moving forward or backward, given that their point of observation is the total chaos of their variegated positions taken by the whirlwind of the conflict between some progressive accent and a vulgar and prevalent right? “.