MIS situation on politics
The judicial chronicles of facts continue to follow one another in the press – dating back to the glories of the infamous 90s of “we were fine up to the present day – in an effluvium of money of suspected origin and an uncertain perfume that ended up in the pockets of subjects in various capacities gravitating in the he orbit of the underworld and merchandise often present in the social and political life of the Republic of San Marino, benefiting the “legitimate beneficiaries” of the price of the sale of their public function. Politicians who have understood corrupt conduct and probably materialized in acts of administrative or legislative value harbingers of beneficial effects in favor of only some but also harmful to the common good and the collective interest.
If from a purely juridical point of view the accusatory thesis emerges, rightly so – due to the passage of time that places a limit on the punitive capacity of the State but above all because of the instrumental use of Justice that has emerged sensationally in the area of Council Commission of Inquiry on political or administrative responsibilities that involved San Marino credit institutions and currently subject to social assessment and the indignation for what emerged in its clamor and in all its extreme gravity remains intact (if not aggravated). On the other hand, a system in which the country’s industrial groups, private and also public, groups and companies important in their sector and in the San Marino economy, economically powerful groups that have participated and contributed, in various and different forms. been able to influence and condition the powers of politics and the San Marino state. Precisely for these reasons we believe that what is emerging judicially has investigated contours capable of damaging the dignity and integrity of all San Marino citizens.
Today, however, it appears clear that under the spotlight of justice the conduct of characters gravitating in the orbit of power opposed to that governing and dominant at the time within the Court have ended, leaving other criminal associations, in their various compositions, conduct and duration it was not possible to ascertain, neither in the times mentioned nor well before and well beyond, with respect to the criminal association held to exist from spring 2003 to May 2006, which mortified the collective good to the detriment of the personal enrichment of the individual political figure. Aware that this is the so-called tip of the iceberg and that little or nothing has changed up to the present day, we would not, therefore, want other dust to end up under the carpet, which we want to be cleaned up without leaving any doubt alone, if only for all those who fearlessly fought for anomalies to emerge, despite the intimidation and political threats, in short, the Good is there, there has always been and always will be there.
In this regard, we consider it truly degrading that forgetful characters promoters of a dubious act typical of the customs of the time but still today the “golds” of the daily news for the generous and uncertain donations received, with nonchalance and jaunty attitude possess the unscrupulousness to re-present themselves at the top of political organizations, instead, if truly animated by an industrious repentance, will remain to dare “good advice” now that they are no longer able to dare to set a bad example.