“Are we all convinced that the opaque San Marino of the past should not return?”
The reference of Secretary Beccari to the Foreign Affairs Commission regarding the Association Agreement with the European Union is of great importance. The most relevant news of recent weeks is that of the resumption of confrontations in the presence between San Marino and the European Union and the definition of the next negotiating union session in June, preceded by a Foreign Affairs Commission for the issues on the table and bring a shared location. For the PSD the issue of the EU has always been the subject of public debate and this is the moment in which this confrontation must become part of the political action of all parties. On the other hand, there seems to be no political force that does not explicitly have a position contrary to the Association Agreement. However, there is an expression that legitimate requests for information on the negotiation are not accompanied by a transparent understanding of one’s expectations and considerations. It seems that this tactics of silence can hide a principled opposition to integration, which certainly entails the definitive change of our economy on which much is already done in terms of aligning with international standards of transparency both in the banking sector and in general in all. the economy. Now we are missing the tear towards compatibility which means staying by the same rules in the same market, and progressing because we are capable of concreteness and competitiveness, not shortcuts of the regulatory differential, which was the pillar of the bankruptcy model that we must abandon. Are there still those who think that the San Marino “to drink” of the 2000s should return? Why, instead of working on generic questions on European integration, do you end up with the unscheduled economic conclusion for an enhanced blacklist and procedure, a conclusion that cannot be the definitive entry into the European market? It’s time to get more out in the open. Several parties, compression some majority movement leaves the issue while on the margins of their activities others, such as Libera, seem to have just forgotten it, even those who, coming from the PSD, had always made it a pillar of their own politics. We believe it escapes no one that budgetary issues and public debt management will not be much easier to manage at all ‘other market conditions for the start of the international debt era, if we had been inside the market European, which is what the Association Agreement aims for. Still several politicians, but also polemics and media, spread falsehoods, confusing this Agreement with membership tout court, instilling concerns that have no place to exist such as the explosion of residences, constraints or international politics. This is the time in which you cannot just ask the government to let people know the status of the negotiations, it is the time in which whoever professes to agree in words with the Association to the EU, is also in concrete terms, avoiding spreading dangerous fake news and work to provide information and training. “
cs Psd
All rights reserved ©