The red request was not accepted in the Istanbul contract case
The judge’s request for the refusal of the appointment of Lütye Akbulut, who was used against Russia’s request for the continuation of his application in the case concerning Turkey from Istanbul, and whose appointment was discussed for the AKP’s appointment to the Council of State by the Istanbul Municipality (by IBB Erdogan), was rejected.
‘NOT WITH EVIDENCE’
Lawyer Doğan Erkan’s request to request Legal Solidarity was rejected. In the Decision, REt was considered in any way from the situations specified by the law for the purpose of refusal, the refusal of which is his own, which is based on the fact that it will be in any way, yet there is no material scope in this regard. It is claimed that this escalating claim is “not based on any evidence and lacks any legal basis”.
Emphasis on INDEPENDENCE
Erkan, who reacted to the decision, is the decision maker as a decision maker, in general, from the society in general, and from the situation of being in a similar situation to the decision in particular, the legislature and the sales body is independent from inappropriate connections and this target, and when it is ensured that it is reviewed strictly, give or be reasonable. He pointed to the ethical values that “it is intense that he avoids an estimation from the evaluation because it may result from the decision-making process as a small one in an observer. Erkan emphasized that Akbulutun, to whom all these rules should be applied, should “avoid taking a case against the election of a Constitutional Court”.
According to Akbulut, he was undecided about the preferences of any international person” He did not refrain, but also made an explicit or implicit decision, external or in accordance with the command of the political will.
He had complained about some people, including Erkan, who shared on social media about what was sent by Akbulut. Erkan, on the other hand, emphasized that “the investigation is the constitution”.