Capital gains, today the ruling: Juventus and Naples waiting
In the afternoon, the decision of the Federal Court. The defenses have aimed to dismantle the “proxy model” on the evaluation of the players, the crux of the “lack of loyalty” remains for the 59 executives under accusation
Will the mountain give birth to a mouse? This is the question that faces today in which the Federal Court will express the first verdict of the judicial process of the capital gains affair. Yesterday was the day of the defenses, today there will be the reply of the federal prosecutor (Chinè has reserved this possibility and it is likely that he will exploit it), then it will be the turn of the council chamber and the device. The attack on the “proxy model” on the evaluation of players was the heart of the defensive theses. Which have entered in the wake of all the previous judicial pronouncements in the sports and criminal fields, the impossibility of arriving at a figure that is unassailable.
“Lack of loyalty”
–
The system for obtaining an objective evaluation of a player has been challenged up to the point of proving the congruity of all the transactions under accusation, which are 51 (most of Juve, but there are also transfer market transactions of Naples, Empoli, Samp and Genoa, in Serie A; of Parma and Pisa in B; of Pro Vercelli and Pescara in C, while Chievo and Novara are no longer affiliated). But the offensive will be even more successful in clearing the table from the “violation of federal regulations in management and economic matters” of the soft paragraph of article 31 and the “lack of loyalty” of article 4 of the Sports Justice Code contested under the 59 below. accusation starting with Agnelli and De Laurentiis?
Criminal unknown
–
It is no coincidence that, especially Grassani for Napoli, he dwelt on the lack of willful misconduct given that Napoli’s budgets were not suffering and there would have been no need, this is the lawyer thesis, of a hyper evaluation of the young legates to the Osimhen affair, the very players on which the federal prosecutor denounced an enormous distance (in one case we are even 70 times) between the value entered in the balance sheet by the blue club and the “adjusted” value according to the parameters of the federal prosecutor. Certainly today’s result will not exhaust the game. Because the overrun in the second degree is discounted, which should arrive in a month, and subsequently to the College of Guarantee. But above all there is an unknown factor. Too bad known. What will emerge from the Turin criminal investigation which obviously has much more incisive investigative tools (see wiretapping) than sports justice?
April 15, 2022 (change April 15, 2022 | 08:09)
© REPRODUCTION RESERVED