“Asylum shopper” refuses to leave Norway – first Norwegian authorities must rectify his dental problems
ad
ad
At the end of February 2022, the foreigner appeared at the Police Immigration Unit (PU), and submitted a protection application.
Resett has been informed (unconfirmed) that the person in question is originally a Moroccan citizen.
Lies and deception
The foreigner’s fingerprint examinations revealed the following:
ad
- Over the past four years, foreigners have sought asylum in seven European countries.
- The foreigner has previously deliberately stated incorrect identity in order to prevent and / or make it difficult to return to his or her home country.
- PU still believes that it is not credible that the foreigner has also stated correct personal details this time.
- In the asylum interview, the foreigner announced that he had not previously applied for asylum in Switzerland and Italy – before he was presented with the fingerprint report from Eurodac.
Interned
On the basis of obvious incorrect information submitted to the Norwegian police, the alien was arrested and detained at the Police Immigration Boarding School.
In a ruling from the Oslo District Court on 1 March 2022, the foreigner was decided to be detained for a period of four weeks.
The foreigner appealed the ruling from the Oslo District Court, but the Borgarting Court of Appeal rejected the appeal.
Read also: Øyvind Eikrem: – The emotional excitement about immigration is not driven by rational considerations (+)
Italy
According to the Dublin III regulation, according to the regulations, Italy is in fact the responsible state that must determine the foreigner’s further basis of residence in the country.
This is because Italy was the first country in Europe in which the foreigner applied for asylum. Therefore, the foreigner from Norway must be prepared for an early return to the Italian immigration authorities.
When the foreigner was to be sent unaccompanied back to Italy in March 2022, he opposed this by refusing and taking the necessary corona test before departure.
Therefore, it was handed over by the same district court especially further detained for four weeks, pending a new return to Italy. This time as a forced return with (hopefully a determined, active and tangible) police escort.
Dental problems
In connection with the last court hearing in Oslo District Court on March 29, 2022, where the district court judge, Ingebjørg Tønnesen, decided to continue detention for four weeks before the foreigner – Resett quotes some of the judge’s own words:
“NN has explained in court that it is the dental problems – which he believes are the responsibility of the Norwegian authorities – that are the reason why he would not contribute to a voluntary deportation.
Regardless of the reason, the court believes that his opposition to voluntary return further substantiates the danger of evasion.
ad
It is not up to the court to decide what kind of dental treatment he is entitled to in Norway ».
Young man from the Middle East charged with very serious attempted murder (+)
Sign up for a subscription
or
support us in other ways
if you want Resett to survive as a counterweight to the established and state-supported media in Norway.
Vipps 124526
Bank account 1503.94.12826
TEXT MESSAGE “Reset”(200, – a bunch) to 2474