The head of the Polish Football Association judges eloquently about the scandal in Krakow. “This is my opinion” Pika None
The past 25th round of the Premier League dinged into mistakes and referees’ controversies, which distorted the results of several matches. Guarantee established location in Krakow, in the meeting between Wisła Krakow and Lech with Lech Tomasz Kwiatkowski after VAR unjustly intervention intervention for Wisła by Joseph Colley, looking at the foul of Zutylk Ondrask on Lech Filip Bednark’s toll. The experts agreed that the judge made a big mistake, low your initial decision. Wisła could take over the game 2-0 and at the end of the end of the game they only drew ten matches 1: 1.
There was also a lot of controversy in the matches between Jagiellonski Białystok and Wisła Płock (0: 1) or Bruk-Bet Termalica Nieciecza – Zagłębie Lubin (0: 2). The College of Judges of PN Tomasz Mikulski in ze Sport.
Jakub Seweryn: How did you like refereeing in the last round of the league?
Tomasz Mikulski (chairman of the PZPN Judges Council): – It is impossible to prepare a queue that the judge will have better results in better better disposition, just as they have to have better results in better disposition.
But they can play games or new football games in the game again, but they have the help of VAR characters.
– Yes, but there is no perfect method. VAR has its big advantages, it probably reduces over 70 percent. mistakes, also in very large situations, to be noticed. We also saw that in the last line, even if we were at all, there was touching readers who were aimed directly at Broad viewers. Only the intervention of the VAR helped here. Sometimes the VAR doesn’t work well, and occasionally, though sometimes it can even make the number worse.
You’re talking about the Wisła-Lech game, right?
– Yes. There is no room for such a situation, for sure the loudest in this line due to its effect. It influenced the final result of the match. However, the difficulty was that it was so much for all classes and not black and white. It is possible to discuss what the final decision should be. I also agree with the opinion of the persons assessing this assessment that the assessment is based on the decision to recognize the totage. Admittedly, the VAR is determined to change, from one controversial to one.
What about your tuition fees?
– Here it was decided that V focused mainly on the touu and focused on showing the hand of the Wisła striker on the touli arm with a touch of detail. From some you could see very clearly that just one VAR shield of the whole situation. And that’s exactly what one should have a future master exam on the monitor. The main judge considered it sufficient (evidence) that the offense of the Wisła attacker paid off. The situation of the situation is lost, that is, it is the attack, that is, the whole context, the whole context is granted, and the duel.
The product de facto entered it …
– Exactly, but I want to say I didn’t say black and white. This is not some use. From the two lectures, the one was chosen. This is my assessment of the situation, but what. After the fact, it is a wrong intervention, there is no doubt about it. However, it results from the willingness to help in choosing the right choice. There were also time sessions, and more detailed descriptions of the situation.
Well, do you have the impression that the VAR person is answering on the basis of situational scoring, which misses the essence of his personification?
– It’s true, there were a few such situations, but there were also a few, I heard voices of indignation why VAR “slept” and did not intervene. Sometimes it’s hard when you become the limit when the VAR should intervene, no. Discussion on the level of VAR intervention in one of two or three levels of dilemmas in refereeing and scoring around the world.
There are different views here. One thing is dogmatic and says that you should only intervene in black and white, “clear and obvious” situations, i.e. those where 100 percent a mistake has been made. Now you probably go into the world that VAR is supposed to help you make the best choices, if one of the prices is better – let’s say for simplicity, that by 80 to 20 percent. that the judge should move a re-three situation room. They are all sorts of different, each with its own rationale, advantages and disadvantages.
What is the line chosen by the Polish Football Association?
– Ours is closer to what UEFA believes, but also non-dogmatic.
Yet many controversies turn into other controversies.
– Sometimes it happens, but I remember the events in which the judges explained to the players that in a given situation there were 90 to 10, and it was the 10 percent. then it determined that no intervention had been undertaken. The players did not understand this. Unfortunately, there is no sharp, measurable one here border and the decision is not the cutting fee. All that, that should not be as “one contented” decision and subscription to the ethnic group. Sometimes it is available, however, that the Good Willing is paved hell and it just goes too far. Hell, when the decision was changed a little bit, but it also happened on a Sunday. However, such a company doesn’t really have much. VAR helps much, much more than it harms. The balance in this respect is definitely positive.
On Sunday there was also a bizarre situation in the new version. In the match between Jagiellonia and Wisła Płock, judge Tomasz Musiał, despite the suggestions of Paweł Raczkowski on the role of VAR, I did not decide to whistle a penalty kick for hitting Michał Pazdan with his elbow by Damian Zbozień. Literally an hour later in the match against Śląsk Wrocław with Radomiak, in almost this situation, the judge Daniel Stefański already dictated a penalty for Śląsk. How can footballers, coaches and fans not get stupid here?
– We all would like everyone to be able to have a share that was going to act for a given action, such possibility, license. But judges not only in Poland, but also around the world, differ. The recognition that it is so admitted that they are awarded to the leagues or UEFA is that they are granted that there are also others who should play. that the situation in Białystok simply shows a different approach by the judges to this issue. It should be added that they really existed, that they really exist, that they still exist, that they still exist.
How does he evaluate these decisions? Which of them is closer to the interpretation of the PZPN Judges College?
– I should still analyze it together, but I can only say that the decision of Stefański’s decision in Wrocław was exemplary.
Eloquent.
– And above all, that he knew who was researching the situation and also enjoyed it. Because let’s not forget that the refereeing on the pitch is still the right refereeing on whether they are primarily for choice. In order for the decision on the pitch to be good, the VAR should be as rare as possible.
Don’t you think VAR checks and interventions just take too long? When there is no doubt about the fans, even after one repetition, and the players, despite the fact that they are still standing, wait for minutes around the referee? An example is the hand with the hand of Bartosz Slisz in Łęczna, mentioned by you, the handing over to a model, and yet you will have to wait 3.5 minutes for the final decision not to recognize the goal.
– Here you need souvenirs that the VAR judge has to check the whole situation. For example, was there an offense along the way, or sgo. Often fans do not realize that they often do it the lion’s share of the entire area. I remember such an action when, on the way to a penalty, there were two offside reports and one potential foul. VAR just wants to have you, that’s why it checked a given currency from many searches, additionally added the best one. Spends time in the race and the dynamics of final decisions.
The most important thing is that it could be correct, I really prefer that I really prefer a given situation. There is no need to be shocked that it takes too long, I admit that it is indeed so. This is true for determining the offside line, but sometimes it is due to technical limitations and sometimes with an updated clock. In the first spring match, there was a situation where there were three defenders at the border of the line, and you had to make a set-up for a substitution from each of them. It took a long time, but it was free.
Don’t you think food judges lack transparency? I mean, whether for different hours and determining information about the situation, or in relation to the arbitrators themselves, how a given action and why they undertook such information, as well as another change. It seems that the boards only succeeded.
– I will rather stick to the fact that we will not debate it in public, especially when it is hot when it is big big.
Why?
– I’m sure it won’t help me. We analyze all these storms calmly, we do not discuss them an hour after the game. Emotions are not our ally. We have our collaborators, where about 200 judges and observers take part, and everything is analyzed and created following the omnipresent message.
Launching DIY job vacancies is a coincidence, but an example at UEFA for internships. In order not to imply transparency measures, we therefore act more like UEFA. Do you remember the controversy, the controversy of the news from the club’s program in UEFA settlements, for example in the place of the presentation of Real with PSG allied to anyone who has UEFA from its inception?
Well, no, but it is debatable whether this is good. I remember that your predecessor, Zbigniew Przesmycki, through experience, analyzed specific contentious pages from the matches of the Premiership at the Polish Football Association.
– And woke up to the next frets. We are on the last line to finalize the project that you can find yourself in from a given week, we will analyze the target on the social networking site and we will pin down the country that deals with issues related to civil rights. which aroused opposition, or is interesting from the point of view.
Let us not delude ourselves, however, that we renew our position, it will cut off all that it will put a stop on the name. It will not be like that, there will be one member who will be on the ball as well as refereeing, everyone knows.