San Marino. The criticism of Repubblica Futura on the political action of the Net
“The permanence of Rete in the government depends on the will of the majority to intensify its political action on the road to a concrete and effective change”: this is the summary of the issue issued today by Rete following its assembly “.
Thus opens a note from Repubblica Futura, which adds: “Already the word” intensify “makes you smile, because it makes you think that something has been done on the change front while in reality in this Legislature the Network (with all its majority) has move in the sense of the most sinister restoration.
Then, if you think about it, this is the change that Rete intends: going back, even on its name!
But the list could include many other topics, other reverses, other signs of a change on the contrary, of a return to the past (which we had hoped forgotten).
These press releases have a bit of a penultimatum, of an attempt to recover a public image irremediably compromised by two years of deceiving their constituents, who voted for that movement thinking it carried out certain requests, but instead did the exact opposite “.
The note from the San Marino minority force continues: “Among other things, it would be interesting to know what is meant by” criticality and operational difficulty of the government in which Rete has been involved for over two years “, since nothing has so far emerged from Rete ( with the exception of a few underlining, however ignored by the competent secretary) about the need to reach a state budget balance as soon as possible. How can we forget the elusive government (or majority?) Verification opened by Rete and closed by the allies with a laugh, or the threatened (secret!) Resignation of Ciavatta, still clinging to his chair at the ISS?
But the apotheosis is reached when we read that it was expressed “disappointment for the criminal investigations conducted against citizens who have published in the local press articles”. Does Rete know that it all started with a statement in court by Secretary of State Roberto Ciavatta, a member of Rete, in one of the many complaints he made in this legislature? If you really believe in this disappointment, why don’t you ask your secretary to withdraw everything and maybe take a step back?
On one point we agree with Rete, that is when the “concern about the delay in reforms” is expressed, which was the main reason (at least so we were told, the reality was very different …) why the Noah’s Ark which is this majority had come together. But we are missing a piece: what does Rete intend to do, concretely, why are these reforms not made? Staying flattened on a majority that doesn’t work and is coming out of more and more broken bones every day? Or look for new ways, without seeing enemies everywhere but looking for broad forms of collaboration in a difficult time for the country? “
Repubblica Futura finally concludes: “To posterity the arduous sentence. One last hint: someone passed the term when in the conversation about “change of pace”, it did not end well … “