Krakow: A manifestation “in defense of the expectations of the courts”
Judges and residents – Krakow residents manifested on Friday evening “in the jurisdiction of the judges and indefinite courts”. The participants were the participants of, inter alia, to the threats which, in their opinion, are posed by conflicts with the EU.
Manifestation under the lighting “I connected the lights for the courts” at ul.
The judge from Kraków, Maciej Czajka, assessed that our country was still active in connection with what was an accident. “We are the website we intend to achieve.
Krystian Markiewicz, president of the association of Polish judges “Iustitia”, commented in the same vein, saying that the events of recent times reveal “the shoe of power and their allies, which unfortunately are obligatory for judges’ gowns”.
He pointed out that in the hunting environment – apart from which they bear consequences for their actions, and which people have, among others, Igor Tuleya and Paweł Juszczyszyn, there is also a group that wants to “ensure impunity for political power.”
The floor was taken by judge of the Supreme Court, Włodzimierz Wróbel, who appealed for solidarity towards “judges who suffer harassment for their honesty”. The judge admitted that for many people of his generation Poland’s sovereignty returned through Poland, and then joining the common European policy became a “security anchor”.
“That is why I say loudly: I am talking about presence, and the acquisition in it is the observance of the rules, the principle that independent, independent courts do not have authoritarianism, no dictatorship, no people beyond the law.
Małgorzata Manowska, President of the Court, in the referendum on the new social peace, solidarity with the judge, became the object of ostracism of the test. “I find it unacceptable to stigmatize, attack and undermine their authority. (…) They should not be ashamed, but only those judges who, by usurping the role of a constitution-maker, undermine the foundations of the judiciary, “she added.
At the same time, she appealed to judges to “restrain themselves and not succumb to the temptation to usurp power that the Constitution and laws have not granted judges to”. “Pride is the enemy of service!” – she added.
“Political activism of a judge, understood as the possibility of recognizing that a given norm is incorrect, or it should apply in a different wording, leading to a violation of governments, and, when possible, when it is considered as its goal. according to the oath taken, she should leave the service “- the facility.