• Home
  • City
    • ALBANIA
    • AMSTERDAM
    • ANDORRA
    • ANNECY
    • ANTWERP
    • ATHENS
    • AUSTRIA
    • AVIGNON
    • BARCELONA
    • BELARUS
    • BELGIUM
    • BERLIN
    • BILBAO
    • BORDEAUX
    • BRNO
    • BRUSSELS
    • BUDAPEST
    • BULGARIA
    • CAEN
    • CALAIS
    • CROATIA
    • CZECH_REPUBLIC
    • DEBRECEN
    • DENMARK
    • DIJON
    • DUBLIN
    • ESTONIA
    • FINLAND
    • FLORENCE
    • FRANKFURT
    • GENEVA
    • GENOA
    • GERMANY
    • GLASGOW
    • GREECE
    • HANNOVER
    • HELSINKI
    • HUNGARY
    • ICELAND
    • INNSBRUCK
    • IRELAND
    • ISTANBUL
    • KRAKOW
    • LIECHTENSTEIN
    • LILLE
    • LIMERICK
    • LISBOA
    • LITHUANIA
    • LONDON
    • LUXEMBOURG
    • LYON
europe-cities.com
  • Home
  • City
    • ALBANIA
    • AMSTERDAM
    • ANDORRA
    • ANNECY
    • ANTWERP
    • ATHENS
    • AUSTRIA
    • AVIGNON
    • BARCELONA
    • BELARUS
    • BELGIUM
    • BERLIN
    • BILBAO
    • BORDEAUX
    • BRNO
    • BRUSSELS
    • BUDAPEST
    • BULGARIA
    • CAEN
    • CALAIS
    • CROATIA
    • CZECH_REPUBLIC
    • DEBRECEN
    • DENMARK
    • DIJON
    • DUBLIN
    • ESTONIA
    • FINLAND
    • FLORENCE
    • FRANKFURT
    • GENEVA
    • GENOA
    • GERMANY
    • GLASGOW
    • GREECE
    • HANNOVER
    • HELSINKI
    • HUNGARY
    • ICELAND
    • INNSBRUCK
    • IRELAND
    • ISTANBUL
    • KRAKOW
    • LIECHTENSTEIN
    • LILLE
    • LIMERICK
    • LISBOA
    • LITHUANIA
    • LONDON
    • LUXEMBOURG
    • LYON

BILBAO

A ruling admits that the Port of Bilbao is unsafe due to the high number of stowaways

Sugar Mizzy February 1, 2023

Image of the container terminal of the Port of Bilbao / AD

The Provincial Court exempts a shipping company from paying the security fee at the container terminal

manu alvarez

The Provincial Court of Bizkaia has concluded that the Port of Bilbao has a high degree of internal insecurity, due to the high number of stowaways that access its interior and manage to sneak onto merchant ships, in space bound for the United Kingdom. It is an issue that goes back a long way, which can even include the construction of a wall to better protect the area where the ferry that connects Bilbao with the south of England docks, but now it has reached the courts. In a ruling handed down this week, the judges exempt a shipping company from paying 730,000 euros corresponding to the ‘security fee’ that the container terminal had paid since 2019. Its ships have been subject to continuous assaults for years and the company has had to pay fines for an import of 113,000 euros to the British authorities, when the arrival of stowaways in the United Kingdom was confirmed.

Claim

In 2019 the Containerships CMA company was planted. Its managers had had enough of the insecurity of the container terminal of the Port of Bilbao and that every other day stowaways also tried to sneak into their containers and ships, with a certain degree of success. So much so that they had accumulated more than 110,000 euros in penalties from the British authorities for illegal immigrants who traveled on their ships and were detected in British docks. Containerships then began to stop paying the ‘security fee’ that it paid to another company, CSP Iberian, the company controlled by the Chinese company Cosco and which manages the container terminal at the Vizcaya docks. This rate is 6.50 euros per container loaded or unloaded from the ships.

Although the terminal has implemented various measures in recent years to try to solve the problem –cameras with people detection software, for example– the truth is that the Court has verified that it has not been enough. Thus, the record of ‘intrusion’ of stowaways or aspirants to it in their area has bulky figures although with a downward trend. Of the 7,470 unauthorized entries registered in 2017, it rose to 632 in 2020. Containerships has proven that it detected an average of more than 20 stowaways per year. This experience led him to hire a private security company to protect the stay of his ships in the port of Biscay, but an economic conflict persisted.

CSP Iberian claimed from Containerships the payment of 730,000 euros in security fees measures not paid since 2019 and initially a commercial court agreed with it, considering that the contract and the fee only oblige the terminal to have security, not that they are effective and achieve the objectives pursued. The Provincial Court, however, has dismantled this thesis to conclude, in summary, that a security fee cannot be required when there is objective data that allows it to be conspicuous by its absence. The data, indicates the judicial ruling for which magistrate Edmundo Rodríguez Achútegui has been a rapporteur, “shows that the number of incidents, intrusions and interceptions is high, so that the means that have been provided have not been sufficient to prevent the unauthorized entry into the terminal and improper access by stowaways to ships”.

Related Posts

BILBAO /

The average expenditure made by tourists in Bilbao Bizkaia increased by 62.8% compared to 2019 | GipuzkoaGaur

BILBAO /

The Cult, The Waterboys, Canned Heat and Nikki Hill, first confirmations of the BBK Bilbao Music Legends Fest 2023

BILBAO /

The high-speed train will arrive in Bilbao in a 6-kilometre underground tunnel

‹ History repeats itself: Argentina, Cremonese and…Naples. The anniversary that makes Azzurri fans dream | A league › Soldiers of fortune: Sweden’s most controversial historian

Recent Posts

  • Norway is increasing its support for the victims of the earthquakes in Turkey and Syria with … – Address
  • Norway is the least happy country in the Nordics – Finland tops the list – Adressa
  • The Deputy Chief of Defense is accused of creating fear among employees – Aftenposten
  • Northern Norway: Average price for electricity of 37.5 øre per kWh on Monday – in Tromsø
  • John Christian Elden – about pastors’ duty of confidentiality, in “Hovedstaden” – TV Vision Norge

Categories

  • ALBANIA
  • AMSTERDAM
  • ANDORRA
  • ANNECY
  • ANTWERP
  • ATHENS
  • AUSTRIA
  • AVIGNON
  • BARCELONA
  • BELARUS
  • BELGIUM
  • BILBAO
  • BORDEAUX
  • BRNO
  • BRUSSELS
  • BUDAPEST
  • BULGARIA
  • CAEN
  • CALAIS
  • City
  • COLOGNE
  • COPENHAGEN
  • CORK
  • CROATIA
  • CZECH_REPUBLIC
  • DEBRECEN
  • DENMARK
  • DIJON
  • ESTONIA
  • FINLAND
  • FLORENCE
  • FRANKFURT
  • GENEVA
  • GENOA
  • GREECE
  • HELSINKI
  • HUNGARY
  • ICELAND
  • INNSBRUCK
  • ISTANBUL
  • KRAKOW
  • LIECHTENSTEIN
  • LISBOA
  • LITHUANIA
  • LUXEMBOURG
  • LYON
  • MALTA
  • MARSEILLE
  • MILAN
  • MOLDOVA
  • MONACO
  • MUNICH
  • NAPLES
  • NETHERLANDS
  • NICE
  • NORWAY
  • PARIS
  • PISA
  • POLAND
  • PORTUGAL
  • PRAGUE
  • ROME
  • ROUEN
  • RUSSIA
  • SALZBURG
  • SAN_MARINO
  • SIENA
  • SLOVAKIA
  • SLOVENIA
  • STRASBOURG
  • SWEDEN
  • SWITZERLAND
  • THESSALONIKI
  • TOULOUSE
  • TURKEY
  • UK_ENGLAND
  • UKRAINE
  • VENICE
  • VERONA
  • VIENNA
  • WARSAW
  • ZURICH

Archives

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • November 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • September 2008
  • June 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2007
  • January 2002
  • January 1970

↑