Knife-killed girl (14) shatters the media’s narrative about the successful…
On Monday morning, two German girls were attacked with a knife by an asylum seeker from Eritrea. One died the same day, while the other is critically injured. The case receives little attention in the Norwegian media. Is this the new normal – more or less censoring out unpleasant events that shatter any narrative about the enriching immigration? What we needed is a focus on consistent deportations in such heinous cases.
Two girls, aged 13 and 14, probably went to school yesterday morning completely clueless about what would await them. An Eritrean asylum seeker (27) stabbed them both before he went back to the asylum reception in the small town of Illerkirchberg (population 5,000).
The 14-year-old died hours after the attack, while the 13-year-old is critically injured. The killer himself must have sustained knife injuries and was operated on for these yesterday. There is talk that he may be declared criminally insane.
“We must not be suspicious of strangers,” say the police
The frenzied attack should have a united media corps turning on all alarms, including her in Norway. But not that time. VG reports the incident and that the killer must be an asylum seeker. Dagbladet sacrificed the case some lines I go. Aftenposten reproduces one NTB notification.
Baden-Württemberg’s Minister of the Interior and Deputy Prime Minister Thomas Strobl (CDU) did not accept the origin of the killer when he went out and expressed his condolences to the relatives of the girls. Strobl was, however, preoccupied with people were not allowed to feel fear: — The background for the action, especially the motive, remains unclear. You are aware “that events of this type arouse fear and emotion”, he said.
The police, for their part, urge openness towards asylum seekers: the police urge people “not to harbor any general suspicions against strangers, people seeking protection or asylum seekers, nor to encourage or support such suspicions”, reports Die Welt.
It is with wonder that one looks out over what was once a peaceful and safe Europe. The wonder is not least about the political leadership that started this illogical immigration project, where anyone can illegally enter Europe and is granted rights at all levels, including the right not to be sent back to where they came from when they commit serious crimes. We never hear a regret from the political side when such incidents happen.
The disclaimer is sky-high. In the name of impudence, there is rather talk of integration on inhalation and exhalation with canapes between the fingers.
They have abandoned the people, the people they have the first responsibility to provide protection in everyday life. And the people forgive them, at least most of them, because otherwise we would put massive protests in the streets. The people appear cowed. But it is self-imposed, but helped along the way by the media, which still can’t get enough unintegrated people to the continent. Reason has been parked for a long time. What remains are the torch train journalists who hide their incompetence behind them fig leaf.
Expel them
Denmark is now putting its foot down and deporting people who were even born in Denmark when they commit violent crimes.
Denmark has indeed stepped into a new legal political era. We do not record any other countries in Western Europe, Norway included, which now deport criminals of non-Western origin almost consistently when there is an opening legally for it.
The case as for now has attracted the most attention in our editorial officeis it Danish born the 22-year-old Somali who was deported for life before Christmas 2020.
Protecting society, “public safety” and “preventing disturbance or crime” are paramount, it was called in the sensational ruling from Odense, a ruling based on the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
The 22-year-old man, called T., was born in Denmark. He has been punished several times since he turned 15, including for theft, robbery, fraud, and more. In January 2019, he was convicted of criminal activity for profit and served three and eight months in prison, respectively. In addition, he received a warning for viewing. This despite the fact that his connection to Denmark is considered “far greater”, as it is called, even to Somalia, where the family originally comes from. In other words, the Danish court places the question of affiliation lower than “public security”. It is the safety of the ordinary citizen that comes first.
In the new verdict in November 2020, the 22-year-old Somali was sentenced to five years in prison for the rape of his wife from Iraq. He also subjected her to violence and burned her with cigarettes. The court believed that there was a high probability that the criminal trajectory will continue. Therefore, he was sentenced to banishment forever.
So what will happen to the 27-year-old Eritrean – who is an illegal migrant, asylum seeker and murderer? Should Germany take a Danish one? Or should political leadership continue in the spirit of Angela Merkel and welcome the whole world to Germany?
This event in Germany also shows with full weight why Europe must abolish the asylum institute. We must have full screening in advance of people who want to be affected, both mentally, ideologically and in terms of values. Who can really disagree with this?
The list of Europeans exposed to stabbings, violence, robbery and degrading violence is now so infinitely long that presumably no body has an overview anymore. Can we live with this condition?
Main illustration: HRS