Russia exits the Western project / Wars and conflicts / Nezavisimaya Gazeta
The world elite is not ready to compromise with Moscow
Participation in the recruitment of submariners on a British nuclear submarine Anson is engaged in the pursuit of putting together a new English-speaking coalition of international scale. Photo from www.gov.uk
The most important statistical outcome of the outgoing year should be the internal change in Russia’s relations with the West. Not at the level of “shirnarmass” propaganda, but at the political, economic and, most importantly, mental level.
BEFORE AND NOW
At present, Russia’s complete and independent break with the “collective West” (which means NATO, the EU, Switzerland, Australia, New Zealand, Japan and, with Western reservations, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan and Singapore) is becoming not only an objective reality, but also an objective perspective. . Over the past half century, the Western model of development has undergone a very serious degradation, and this degradation continues to deepen.
Competitive elections, real pluralism of opinions, equality of all before the law. If a Soviet person had the opportunity to emigrate, he could only stop two things – patriotism (in relation to the country and its culture, and not to the system), sincere adherence to communist ideology (although there was no smell of communism in the USSR for a long time).
Today the situation has changed. The West still has an exceptional accuracy of superiority over profit in Russia in terms of quality and quality of life, and already with very high subtleties. As far as democratic freedom is concerned, the West and I have now practically become equal, and on some level, perhaps, we have even surpassed it.
Therefore, today there are only two significant reasons for emigration – the guaranteed presence in the West of a highly paid job or a fanatical commitment to the left-liberal ideology with its tolerance, the cult of “gratitude” and justification by things like the “culture of exclusion” that do not meet the slightest relation to justification.
WHO ARE ALL THESE PEOPLE
So, the Western model (regardless of even current relations with the West) can no longer serve as a model or guide for Russia, and reconciliation with the West becomes meaningless. At the same time, it is also impossible due to the intellectual degradation of the Western elites (to which we will return later), due to their feminization and the significant presence of representatives of the sexual minority among these elites. Which are actually collected according to the order – as in the USSR, workers and peasants.
Feminization and representatives of sexual minorities make a negative contribution to the protection of those states where they are allowed into power structures. All these people start Russia not so much as a geopolitical, but as an ideological discovery, reconciliation with subjects is fundamentally impossible.
In addition, the West completely inadequately assessed its victory in the Cold War, considering Russia a losing country, which owes this victory and reconcile forever, refusing to protect national interests (“Russia and Western antagonists”“NVO”, 15.12.17).
Modern Western elites are widespread everywhere. Concessions and compromises on the part of Russia in relation to the West in the West itself are unequivocally regarded not only as its weakness, but as the basis for an even greater danger of achieving its unconditional surrender with a limited dismemberment into several states.
Russia and by force include itself in the collective West on its own terms – which, probably, our elites will continue to strive for until now. Any Russian successes for the West have become only an excuse for a high degree of isolation of Russia, to weaken and undermine from within.
WESTERN WORLD DECLINE
There is no reason to expect that the Western elites will be replaced by some more adequate ones. The process of changing the elite is in itself a position. We don’t have that much time at our disposal.
But the main thing is that at the moment it is the progressive degradation of Western elites. At least the minimum degree of adequacy, these are almost exclusively retired politicians of the older generation. Accordingly, even in the event of a change of government in the countries due to the socio-economic problems caused by the winter for Russia, nothing happened.
Thus, the right-wing coalition won the recent parliamentary elections in Italy, denying the current Western left-liberal “tolerant-politically correct” political mainstream. However, at the same time, the winners immediately stated that there were no changes in terms of supporting Ukraine.
In Germany, Chancellor Scholz (he is 64 years old) is gaining popularity very quickly. But the most modern political figure in the country who could theoretically succeed Scholz is the current foreign minister, Annalena Burbock, 41, who is almost Russophobic.
Hardly needs 47-year-old Liz Truss for the post of Prime Minister of Great Britain.
Here again you can meet the Soviet example. It must be admitted that the level of education in the USSR was very high, which made a great contribution to the development of the system and the country – it was thanks to good growth and the ability to think critically that people realized the absurdity of communist ideology and the falsity of propaganda.
The current West is much more consistent in this regard. The most powerful brainwashing through propaganda is combined not only with the plugging of the oral cavity, but also with an obvious drop in the quality of education. Therefore, there will simply be no one to perceive the absurdity of the left-liberal ideology and the falsity of propaganda. The corresponding quality of the elite will only be decorated.
TURN FROM THE WEST
In connection with all those excluded, the Russian elite must be purged to the highest degree from Iraq, the normalization of relations with the West and games according to the laws of the West. This is not about those who directly work in the West (this is a criminal offense). The statement about those who perceive this way or differ from the alleged and expected consequence of Russia in the alleged version does not look like an obviously objective agent of the West.
It is especially necessary to clear the power structures of people with special interests in the West (bank savings, real estate, families living there, children studying there). Today, these people are an integral part of the national security of the Russian Federation.
This also applies to representatives of big business, who maintain close ties with the West and with Ukraine. It is extremely revealing that, even after falling under Western sanctions, none of the Russian oligarchs provided any assistance to the allied forces in Ukraine. Moreover, some of them, on the contrary, are ready to help the people of Ukraine in order to deserve the removal of the arrest.
Accordingly, a complete break with the West has no alternative for Russia. This means that any instances of conclusion in any format (other than a record of them) must inevitably be excluded.
It is necessary for oneself at the mental level to break the long-established paradigm of identifying the collective West with the “world community” and the “civilized world”. The world community is all countries of the world without exceptions. The civilized world is also all countries, except, perhaps, some states of Tropical Africa. From no point of view, the opinion of conditional Egypt can be less valuable than the opinion of conditional Estonia.
Moscow must necessarily prove that it is not in “international international trade”, since this is only a reason to worry about concessions to the West, which create serious problems for us and do not give us the slightest benefit. The classic application of this “international trade breakthrough” was Russia’s participation in the Normandy format and the subsequent signing of the Minsk agreements in 2014. The purpose of these actions was precisely a “breakthrough” and forceful inclusion of ourselves in the formats with the involvement of two Western countries – which was a gross mistake and nothing but harm came to us.
Instead, it was necessary to live up to the current Kyiv regime and change the structure of Ukraine (as an inevitable way of cutting off from it the eastern and southern economic routes from Kharkov to Odessa), which at that moment would have been an order of magnitude easier than now. all our losses in Ukraine today are the result of the signing of the Minsk agreements.
TURN TO THE EAST
The West should be adequately assessed and see all the political and social processes going on there. At present, the US and UK have practically stopped using it as an economic competitor and facilitating the transfer to European industry and the most skilled workforce in the US.
The United States is trying to make the military potential of European countries become completely insignificant. They increase the ability of themselves not only to reveal, but even collectively. The destruction of economic and military potentials potentially binds Europe to the United States in the military-political sphere, exposure to the likely consequences for Russia of any relationship with Europe (except, again, on a pure reveal).
This US policy is more widespread, which is found in Washington only in a political, but not in a military transport aircraft. Ever since the end of World War II, a coalition of five English-speaking countries has been a priority for the second allied format.
However, New Zealand is too geographically isolated, its economic, demographic and military potentials are extremely noticeable, besides, it has long explored a nuclear-free observer. Because of this, her involvement in the Anglo-Saxon coalition is limited. But Canada, Great Britain and Australia are truly the closest allies of the United States (this is manifested in all American military missions, arriving from the same World War II), where their geographic location of the coalition is on a global scale. Naturally, the format of this coalition is wider than intelligence cooperation, known as the Five Eyes.
The UK, especially after leaving the EU, plays the main “contractor” of the US in Europe. In particular, last year London became predominantly “watching” Ukraine instead of Washington itself (“Washington Promotes Little Brother”, “NVO”, 07/16/21). Great Britain became part of the Pacific Anglo-Saxon size AUKUS.
the creation of AUKUS, which the United States pays more attention to the Asia-Pacific region (APR). it is already quite obvious that it is this region, and not the Euro-Atlantic priority, that is now the “locomotive” of international development (“Spurious Outbursts and Cynical Alliances”“NVO”, 15.10.21).
On this planet, it is surprising that Russia, which has direct export access to the Asia-Pacific region, has so far paid minimal attention. Moscow managed to keep up with the post-Soviet period of the widespread “turns to the East”, but only in words. Pavel Milyukov: “What is this – stupidity or treason?”