• Home
  • City
    • ALBANIA
    • AMSTERDAM
    • ANDORRA
    • ANNECY
    • ANTWERP
    • ATHENS
    • AUSTRIA
    • AVIGNON
    • BARCELONA
    • BELARUS
    • BELGIUM
    • BERLIN
    • BILBAO
    • BORDEAUX
    • BRNO
    • BRUSSELS
    • BUDAPEST
    • BULGARIA
    • CAEN
    • CALAIS
    • CROATIA
    • CZECH_REPUBLIC
    • DEBRECEN
    • DENMARK
    • DIJON
    • DUBLIN
    • ESTONIA
    • FINLAND
    • FLORENCE
    • FRANKFURT
    • GENEVA
    • GENOA
    • GERMANY
    • GLASGOW
    • GREECE
    • HANNOVER
    • HELSINKI
    • HUNGARY
    • ICELAND
    • INNSBRUCK
    • IRELAND
    • ISTANBUL
    • KRAKOW
    • LIECHTENSTEIN
    • LILLE
    • LIMERICK
    • LISBOA
    • LITHUANIA
    • LONDON
    • LUXEMBOURG
    • LYON
europe-cities.com
  • Home
  • City
    • ALBANIA
    • AMSTERDAM
    • ANDORRA
    • ANNECY
    • ANTWERP
    • ATHENS
    • AUSTRIA
    • AVIGNON
    • BARCELONA
    • BELARUS
    • BELGIUM
    • BERLIN
    • BILBAO
    • BORDEAUX
    • BRNO
    • BRUSSELS
    • BUDAPEST
    • BULGARIA
    • CAEN
    • CALAIS
    • CROATIA
    • CZECH_REPUBLIC
    • DEBRECEN
    • DENMARK
    • DIJON
    • DUBLIN
    • ESTONIA
    • FINLAND
    • FLORENCE
    • FRANKFURT
    • GENEVA
    • GENOA
    • GERMANY
    • GLASGOW
    • GREECE
    • HANNOVER
    • HELSINKI
    • HUNGARY
    • ICELAND
    • INNSBRUCK
    • IRELAND
    • ISTANBUL
    • KRAKOW
    • LIECHTENSTEIN
    • LILLE
    • LIMERICK
    • LISBOA
    • LITHUANIA
    • LONDON
    • LUXEMBOURG
    • LYON

PORTUGAL

Portugal is closer to the top 10 countries with the best climate score

Sugar Mizzy November 19, 2022

Portugal improved its performance within a ranking that includes 59 countries. However, it lags behind oil, gas and coal producing countries

Portugal improved its position in the Climate Change Performance Index. It was, in the table for 2023, in 14th place, among 59 countries, above the 16th conquered in the previous year.

Portugal improved in polluting gas emissions, which are now assessed as being at an average level, allowing this category to climb 16 places compared to the previous year. The country’s ranking is also average on the three criteria that are evaluated: energy use, renewable energy and climate policy.

Ceasing the use of coal for electricity production in 2021 was a “huge improvement”. With regard to climate policy, despite the reinforcement of the Climate Law, this “ambitious care in some aspects”, for example, the forecast that fossil fuel deposits will only end in 2030. It is also pointed out that emissions related to transport continues to increase despite planned investments in public transport. The lack of support to expand sustainable agriculture or to prevent forest fires is also criticized.

Renewable energy ranks “high” but “more decentralized solar energy is needed,” reads the report. Initiatives to decarbonize the electricity sector and promote energy efficiency are also mandatory. These estimates were authored by Francisco Ferreira and Pedro Nunes from Zero, and Laura Carvalho from Quercus, who collaborated in the elaboration of the Index.

Nobody deserves the podium

This index has a peculiarity: the first three places, the only ones that correspond to a “very high” performance, are empty. This is because they are reserved for countries whose performance is compatible with the objective of keeping global warming below 1.5ºC, and none of the evaluated countries fit this compatibility. The country with the best ranking, Denmark, appears in fourth place, in the same category as Portugal, that is, both have a “high” performance.

Both Denmark and Sweden remained in the highest places, which they already occupied in the previous year. Denmark is committed to a 70% reduction in pollutant emissions by 2030, compared to 1990 levels, and stands out for its performance in terms of emissions, renewable energy and climate policy, although when it comes to the use of energy takes 26th place. The Nordic country is applauded for introducing a new carbon tax in June 2022, but criticized for betting “too much” on carbon capture, the report indicates.

Close behind, Sweden, also ranks highly in the category of polluting emissions and renewable energy, but climate policy already only receives an average score and energy use is at the “very low” level.

Large fossil producers are highly ranked

At the level of “high” performance, there are also three countries that are, at the same time, in the group of the largest producers of oil, gas and coal. They are India, Norway and the United Kingdom, which are in eighth, tenth and 11th places, respectively. All ahead of Portugal

India “benefits from lower levels of emissions and energy use per capita very low, and has also invested in renewable energies”, justifies Zero. The country scores “average” on climate policy, despite planning to increase fossil fuel production by 2030.

In the report, it is evident that Norway performs “very high” in renewable energy, which represents more than 50% of the country’s energy production. Pollutant emissions and ecological policy want an “average” score. There is a “very high” carbon tax for several sectors and support for the acquisition of electric cars. But there are still no plans to stop the demand for oil and gas, in fact, the plan is to increase gas production by 5% by 2030.

Finally, the UK scores high on emissions and energy use, followed by an ‘average’ score on renewable energy. The plan is to double the use of renewable energy in 15 years and end the sale of vehicles to diesel by 2030. But it also has no plans to end fossil fuel generation and continues to subsidize them.

China and the United States meet at the bottom of the table

Among the worst performers is China, which dropped even 13 places. It is in 51st place, still above the United States, which occupies the 53rd. China “has shown strong development in renewable energies, but has invested in coal-fired power plants” and plans to increase gas and coal production compared to 2019, by 5%, by 2030. “Due to new investments in coal-fired power plants, China recorded the biggest drop of all in the ranking”, says Zero, in a statement.

The United States ranks “very low” on almost every criterion: emissions, renewables and energy use. Only climate policy deserves an “average” in the report, and supports the country’s rise in the table.

Related Posts

PORTUGAL /

Portugal is the second country most behind schedule in REACT-EU – ECO

PORTUGAL /

“I came to the biggest club in Portugal”

PORTUGAL /

Siemens Portugal opens up to the financial area. There are 10 vacancies – ECO

‹ Luka yells at Bones for not switching to his Slovenian teammate › Patras: a 15-year-old girl disappeared from Karamandanio

Recent Posts

  • Northern Norway: Average price for electricity of 38.4 øre per kWh on Sunday – in Tromsø
  • Politics, Oil/Energy | Renewable Norway wants fewer electricity companies – Nettavisen
  • 7 questions and answers about the Baneheia case – NRK Norway – Overview … – NRK
  • Prisons-Norway introduces emergency measures after suicide – Frifagbevegelse.no
  • Thorstvedt’s sex joke makes the Norway profile smile – Nettavisen

Categories

  • ALBANIA
  • AMSTERDAM
  • ANDORRA
  • ANNECY
  • ANTWERP
  • ATHENS
  • AUSTRIA
  • AVIGNON
  • BARCELONA
  • BELARUS
  • BELGIUM
  • BILBAO
  • BORDEAUX
  • BRNO
  • BRUSSELS
  • BUDAPEST
  • BULGARIA
  • CAEN
  • CALAIS
  • City
  • COLOGNE
  • COPENHAGEN
  • CORK
  • CROATIA
  • CZECH_REPUBLIC
  • DEBRECEN
  • DENMARK
  • DIJON
  • ESTONIA
  • FINLAND
  • FLORENCE
  • FRANKFURT
  • GENEVA
  • GENOA
  • GREECE
  • HELSINKI
  • HUNGARY
  • ICELAND
  • INNSBRUCK
  • ISTANBUL
  • KRAKOW
  • LIECHTENSTEIN
  • LISBOA
  • LITHUANIA
  • LUXEMBOURG
  • LYON
  • MALTA
  • MARSEILLE
  • MILAN
  • MOLDOVA
  • MONACO
  • MUNICH
  • NAPLES
  • NETHERLANDS
  • NICE
  • NORWAY
  • PARIS
  • PISA
  • POLAND
  • PORTUGAL
  • PRAGUE
  • ROME
  • ROUEN
  • RUSSIA
  • SALZBURG
  • SAN_MARINO
  • SIENA
  • SLOVAKIA
  • SLOVENIA
  • STRASBOURG
  • SWEDEN
  • SWITZERLAND
  • THESSALONIKI
  • TOULOUSE
  • TURKEY
  • UK_ENGLAND
  • UKRAINE
  • VENICE
  • VERONA
  • VIENNA
  • WARSAW
  • ZURICH

Archives

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • November 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • September 2008
  • June 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2007
  • January 2002
  • January 1970

↑