• Home
  • City
    • ALBANIA
    • AMSTERDAM
    • ANDORRA
    • ANNECY
    • ANTWERP
    • ATHENS
    • AUSTRIA
    • AVIGNON
    • BARCELONA
    • BELARUS
    • BELGIUM
    • BERLIN
    • BILBAO
    • BORDEAUX
    • BRNO
    • BRUSSELS
    • BUDAPEST
    • BULGARIA
    • CAEN
    • CALAIS
    • CROATIA
    • CZECH_REPUBLIC
    • DEBRECEN
    • DENMARK
    • DIJON
    • DUBLIN
    • ESTONIA
    • FINLAND
    • FLORENCE
    • FRANKFURT
    • GENEVA
    • GENOA
    • GERMANY
    • GLASGOW
    • GREECE
    • HANNOVER
    • HELSINKI
    • HUNGARY
    • ICELAND
    • INNSBRUCK
    • IRELAND
    • ISTANBUL
    • KRAKOW
    • LIECHTENSTEIN
    • LILLE
    • LIMERICK
    • LISBOA
    • LITHUANIA
    • LONDON
    • LUXEMBOURG
    • LYON
europe-cities.com
  • Home
  • City
    • ALBANIA
    • AMSTERDAM
    • ANDORRA
    • ANNECY
    • ANTWERP
    • ATHENS
    • AUSTRIA
    • AVIGNON
    • BARCELONA
    • BELARUS
    • BELGIUM
    • BERLIN
    • BILBAO
    • BORDEAUX
    • BRNO
    • BRUSSELS
    • BUDAPEST
    • BULGARIA
    • CAEN
    • CALAIS
    • CROATIA
    • CZECH_REPUBLIC
    • DEBRECEN
    • DENMARK
    • DIJON
    • DUBLIN
    • ESTONIA
    • FINLAND
    • FLORENCE
    • FRANKFURT
    • GENEVA
    • GENOA
    • GERMANY
    • GLASGOW
    • GREECE
    • HANNOVER
    • HELSINKI
    • HUNGARY
    • ICELAND
    • INNSBRUCK
    • IRELAND
    • ISTANBUL
    • KRAKOW
    • LIECHTENSTEIN
    • LILLE
    • LIMERICK
    • LISBOA
    • LITHUANIA
    • LONDON
    • LUXEMBOURG
    • LYON

LISBOA

Free critique “excessive dependence on tourism” in Lisbon’s budget for 2023 – Observer

Sugar Mizzy November 18, 2022

Livre in the Lisbon Chamber today considered that the municipal budget proposal for 2023 reflects “disinvestment” in mobility and decarbonization and “excessive dependence on tourism”, in which it underestimates that associated with the current inflationary crisis.

“The budgets on which the budget is based reflect the post-pandemic economic recovery, but underestimate that associated with the current inflationary crisis”, said Livre at the Lisbon City Council (CML), in a written reaction sent to the Lusa agency on the proposed municipal budget for 2023, presented on Tuesday by the PSD/CDS-PP leadership, which governs without an absolute majority.

Without revealing what the vote for the proposal will be, the Livre party, which has one elected member of the Lisbon city council, councilor Rui Tavares, said that the budget for next year maintains “too great dependence on tourist activity and investment speculative alien”.

These two situations, “especially the continuation of the commitment to unregulated tourism as the engine of the city’s economy, add enormous pressure to the housing market”, warned Livre, noting that the proposal to increase the budget for the tourism sector by four million euros, “at the same time that the budget for culture decreases from 41.5 million in 2022 to 38.8 million euros in 2023”.

According to the presentation made by the vice-president of the CML, Filipe Anacoreta Correia (CDS-PP), who is in charge of Finance, the proposed municipal budget for 2023 suggests an increase in the amount intended for culture area, rising from 45 million euros in 2022 to 55 million next year.

Livre stressed that the CML’s budget proposal for 2023 “is a document that is based on a progression of revenue growth that is strongly dependent on direct taxes”, such as the Municipal Property Tax (IMI) and the Municipal Tax on Onerous Property Transfers ( IMT ) and the pour (municipal tax on corporate profits), as well as fees and fines.

On the revenue side, the party criticized “the loss of around seven million euros from the fixed participation in the IRS [Imposto sobre o Rendimento das Pessoas Singulares]compared to the previous year”, as a result of the increase in the return of this tax to residents, which increased from 2.5% to 3%, and which next year could be 3.5%: “This year alone, this translates into in a loss of total revenue of around 47 million euros”.

From the analysis of the proposed budget for 2023, Livre noted “the total stagnation of initiatives in terms of housing, in particular, new construction”, which it considers essential for Lisbon, as well as “robust and swift investment in quality public housing and other options at controlled prices”.

The party said that the budget of the municipal company SRU for 2023, within the scope of affordable income, “is reduced compared to 2022 and the budget forecasts for 2023 and 2024 fall compared to that foreseen in the multi-annual plan 2021-2025 — of around 98 million to 70 million euros, over the two years as a whole, when comparing this GOP instrument [Grandes Opções do Plano] with the proposal for 2023-2027”.

At the health level, Livre reiterated that the “Lisboa 65+” health plan continues to raise doubts and indicated that the proposed expenditure for this area in 2023 “drops considerably, from 29 million euros to around 10 million”.

In the area of ​​mobility, he warned that “the Municipal Directorate of Mobility goes from a total budgeted expenditure of 94 million euros in 2022 to 71 million euros in 2023”, criticizing the complete stagnation of the expansion of the cycling network and highlighting the disinvestment of the network Gira, explaining that the planned investment for shared parties next year “increases, but only compared to 2022, the lowest budget since the creation of Gira in 2017”.

With regard to soft mobility, according to the deputy mayor, the proposed budget is three million euros for 2023, which represents an increase of 50% compared to 2022, and includes the reinforcement of the Gira shared bicycle network, with the provision of 29 more stations and 1,000 more bicycles.

The municipal budget proposal for 2023, which will be discussed by the executive council on November 30, proposes an expenditure of 1,305 million euros, higher than the replacement for this year (1.16 million), and which “is in line with expectations of revenue”, even the values ​​coincide, expecting the chamber to have an “investment growth of around 15%”, which could reach 455 million euros.

This is Lisbon’s second municipal budget of the current mandate, 2021-2025, under the presidency of social democrat Carlos Moedas, who governs without an absolute majority, with seven elected members of the “Novos Tempos” coalition (PSD/CDS-PP/MPT/ PPM/Aliança) among the 17 elements that make up the executive council.

The first budget of the PSD/CDS-PP leadership was approved thanks to the abstention of the five PS councillors, having received the votes against the rest of the opposition, namely two from the PCP, one from BE, one from Livre and one from the independent councilor of Citizens for Lisbon (elected by the PS/Livre coalition).

In the municipal budget for 2022, the council forecast an expenditure of 1.16 billion euros, higher than the previous year (1.15 billion in 2021), highlighting the measure of free public transport for residents in Lisbon under the age of 23 years and over 65, with an annual budget of up to 14.9 million euros.

PUB • CONTINUE READING BELOW

Related Posts

LISBOA /

iCapital wants to hire 100 people and part of them can stay in Lisbon – Expert

LISBOA /

Budget approved by Coins for 3 stages in Lisbon is 705 thousand euros

LISBOA /

Lisbon City Council will rehouse 25 families after expropriations for Drainage Plan

‹ No to Napoli, to the 350 million Arabs and now also to Man United: thoughts, words and future of CR7 › ″The more Portugal is centralized, the more Porto fans love FC Porto″

Recent Posts

  • Northern Norway: Average price for electricity of 33.7 øre per kWh on Wednesday – in Tromsø
  • Former Conservative cabinet minister demands that Norway pay more to countries that … – Document.no
  • The plague of a weak krone: – The view of Norway is becoming dangerous – NRK
  • Norway is increasing its support for the victims of the earthquakes in Turkey and Syria with … – Address
  • Norway is the least happy country in the Nordics – Finland tops the list – Adressa

Categories

  • ALBANIA
  • AMSTERDAM
  • ANDORRA
  • ANNECY
  • ANTWERP
  • ATHENS
  • AUSTRIA
  • AVIGNON
  • BARCELONA
  • BELARUS
  • BELGIUM
  • BILBAO
  • BORDEAUX
  • BRNO
  • BRUSSELS
  • BUDAPEST
  • BULGARIA
  • CAEN
  • CALAIS
  • City
  • COLOGNE
  • COPENHAGEN
  • CORK
  • CROATIA
  • CZECH_REPUBLIC
  • DEBRECEN
  • DENMARK
  • DIJON
  • ESTONIA
  • FINLAND
  • FLORENCE
  • FRANKFURT
  • GENEVA
  • GENOA
  • GREECE
  • HELSINKI
  • HUNGARY
  • ICELAND
  • INNSBRUCK
  • ISTANBUL
  • KRAKOW
  • LIECHTENSTEIN
  • LISBOA
  • LITHUANIA
  • LUXEMBOURG
  • LYON
  • MALTA
  • MARSEILLE
  • MILAN
  • MOLDOVA
  • MONACO
  • MUNICH
  • NAPLES
  • NETHERLANDS
  • NICE
  • NORWAY
  • PARIS
  • PISA
  • POLAND
  • PORTUGAL
  • PRAGUE
  • ROME
  • ROUEN
  • RUSSIA
  • SALZBURG
  • SAN_MARINO
  • SIENA
  • SLOVAKIA
  • SLOVENIA
  • STRASBOURG
  • SWEDEN
  • SWITZERLAND
  • THESSALONIKI
  • TOULOUSE
  • TURKEY
  • UK_ENGLAND
  • UKRAINE
  • VENICE
  • VERONA
  • VIENNA
  • WARSAW
  • ZURICH

Archives

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • November 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • September 2008
  • June 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2007
  • January 2002
  • January 1970

↑