In the experiences of the ‘Century of Turkey’ – Yeni Şafak
New Dawn · Selçuk Türkyılmaz – On the exam of the ‘Turkish Century’
The Ottoman period will generally be less than the resources of those who want something. Of course, I do not mean those who set out for their intended use. Some of the people who know about the resources are informed about the general information about the general information about the general information about the general information. To approach this sharply is to acknowledge that you can be accepted. This also applies to people in the education system. Unfortunately, they also have precise information about the Ottoman period. We can escape from this necklace to shipping to other shoulders than ourselves. Falling out of favor to hit our opponents will disappear.
It is really interesting that it adopts imperialism and colonialism practices based on the imperial model about the Ottoman period. You won’t be able to do anything like being responsible and not being used to denote a group. This is a widely accepted perception and unthinkably benefits from a review of educational training. One of these gains is the transfer of perception to new generations. problematic identities are built with history. So, does this mean to be dependent on one’s tongue?
I preferred the colonial issue in the question. If I had bought the models, it would have been much more detailed. We would have to grapple with the expression that this Ottoman state should be used as colonialist. The reality in reality is the product of these statements. However, even the concept of quasi-stemleke used by certain ideological groups was problematic. In fact, since this concept is old, how it was used quasi-random before the value, mentioning the same term without mentioning it. You know, right at birth. Its meaning is not fully determined and is trying to be accepted by this type of approach to education in general. It can be included in this environment by “submitting to the language of the system”.
Both those who were alienated and those who came from the regions that belonged to defending the Ottoman Empire by using sentences such as “The Ottoman was also a colonialist” are very structures to gather on their meanings. We do this in daoxydentalism research. Orientalism corresponds to an ideological perspective that emerged as a manifestation of the colonialism of Western Europe. In particular, the late Edward Said directed criticism towards this view. If you do not know a thoughtful way to remove the occidentalism that will come from orientalism, you will have reduced it to a neighborhood fight. To reveal a judgment as it is thought, “Civil society is also about Westerners”. The Western detailed information of Muslims, Turks, or those outside the West in general, is not from a true and correct colonialist point of view. Thus, the possibility of the Turkish and Islamic Western perception and the way it can be emphasized is occidentalist, in contrast with the way it emerges or can be reflected.
The Ottoman Empire dominated three continents, it cannot be colonialist, imperialist and occidentalist. I also used it in colonialism in this last sentence. Is it possible for a scientist to describe the Ottoman Empire as a colonialist with his chest? The one who distorts reality as colonizers of Turkish dervishes in the Balkans! nothing else worked. It is a link system between the Turkish dervishes’ occupation of certain lands and colonialism as a system. When the new concept became widespread because it was Turkish, a strange phenomenon such as “Ottoman was also a colonialist” emerged and this was generally accepted. The absurdity of such a demonstration emerges.
Those who want to apply a similar deception with Turkish dervish officials to North Africa will also be left empty-handed. The practices applied in Algeria, Libya and Tunisia can be mentioned. These will not go beyond problems in all parts of the Ottoman geography in general. After all, these are to reveal a concept like the Eastern Question.